Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina Department of Insurance director loses property coverage
Rock Hill Herald ^ | 09/04/07

Posted on 09/05/2007 12:31:12 PM PDT by Between the Lines

Add the director of the South Carolina Department of Insurance to the thousands of coastal homeowners who have lost property insurance since Hurricane Katrina.

Scott Richardson, who lives on Hilton Head Island, was notified three weeks ago that his policy would be dropped.

Following Katrina two years ago, premiums rose as much as 400 percent in hurricane-prone areas, and many insurers stopped writing coverage.

Richardson now finds himself shopping for insurance.

"I guess it just proves nobody's immune. If I'm not immune, then nobody is," said Richardson, who was appointed to head the Insurance Department in February.

Richardson may have to join the South Carolina Wind and Hail Underwriting Association, known as the wind pool. In July, the department announced rate increases averaging 35 percent.

"I might be in the wind pool before you know it," Richardson said. "I get to try a little of my own medicine."

The wind pool provides last-resort coverage in areas where other insurers have stopped writing policies. Florida's program created three years ago attracted 1.3 million customers and became the state's largest property insurance provider.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: poobear

Insurance companies are like bookies. They lay off part of the possible liability to re-insurers. Insurance companies never take the full hit from something such as a hurricane or a twister.


21 posted on 09/05/2007 2:10:36 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

Florida gave the insurers a break on re-insurance...hoping they’d lower their rates because of it and pass the savings along to the consumer, but they just used the windfall to buy more re-insurance from their parent company (at least that’s what State Farm did.)


22 posted on 09/05/2007 2:21:45 PM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

If a company buys re-insurance from its parent company isn’t it failing to off set any of the liability for the parent company. I don’t see an advantage to the parent company of entering into such an arrangement.


23 posted on 09/05/2007 2:54:25 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

Here’s the article that explains their practice of buying reinsurance from their parent company. It’s under the heading “What’s Fair”

http://www.sptimes.com/2007/07/15/State/Muddy_waters_of_reins.shtml


24 posted on 09/05/2007 3:15:23 PM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

Thank you.


25 posted on 09/05/2007 5:31:28 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson