Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedRover
Bad news always comes in threes. So far, for the military today, we have had this idiocy and the Blue Suiters losing a few nuc warheads.

What’s #3? What’s next?!

Seriously, this could result in dismissal of all charges against the Marines.

There is an old UCMJ provision (please bear with me, I’m going back 40 years) that requires that Gmvt’s counsel could be no more qualified than Defense counsel.

That was back when Combat Arms officers would serve as defense counsel of accused in Summary Court Martial.

Rule was simple. if Gmvt used a lawyer to present case, defendant had to get a lawyer to. if Gmvt used a line officer, accused did not have to be furnished a “real” lawyer as counsel.

If more than one lawyer is working on Gmvt case in this matter, then is unfair to defendants... in addition to being exceptionally stupid PR.

Grounds for successful appeal.

10 posted on 09/05/2007 7:08:11 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MindBender26

The lawyers have f___ked with the UCMJ. As you say, once upon a time a line officer could handle a case. Now there is so much “process” and less chance for a fair verdict.


47 posted on 09/05/2007 11:31:12 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson