You disagree with his stance on the Iraq War and nature of his opposition to the Federal Reserve.
I agree he often states conservative positions. However, I cannot accept the rationalization behind his earmarks. Tom Coburn has shown that position to be untenable for a principled conservative.
And Paul's opposition to the Iraq War is a deal-breaker. I will freely admit to being a single-issue voter in one regard - being opposed to the Iraq War is my single issue, above all others.
I never figured you to be against the Iraq war. ?
Yikes, I actually have to bump your post. Strange times.
bttt!
For me it wasn’t just his opposition to the Iraq war, because while I disagreed it was a principled non-interventionist position and he was consistant.
It’s his recent pronouncements about our culpability for 9/11, which while milder than some make out, are just too much for me to bear, especially seeing how much those comments are embraced by the nuts on the left.