Replies

No rebuttal to Romney's current social liberal stances, supporting embryonic stem cell research and gay rights?

I'm sure it's hard to disprove something that Mitt goes around proudly proclaiming all the time. But it would amuse me to see the depths of denial to which the Mitt-worshippers have sunk. :)

Romney opposes federal funding for all embryonic stem cell research that involves ending a human life. That's the bottom line as it relates to us.

What Romney actually thinks about embryonic stem-cell research.

_______________________________

There's also this on Ann Romney:

In a 2/14/07 appearance on ABC "Good Morning America", Ann Romney talks about her personal struggle with multiple sclerosis and offers her perspective on embryonic stem cell research with a powerful, inspiring message opposing medical experimentation that could conceivably relieve her own suffering. Read a thought-provoking commentary by Alliance Defense Fund attorney David French on Ann Romney's strength of character in opposing embryonic stem cell research as seen in the ABC "Good Morning America" segment.
Ann Romney on Stem Cell Research

_________________________________

There's also this:

Kennedy rips Romney over stem cells as Governor eyes an alternate plan

By Rick Klein and Gareth Cook, Globe Staff | February 16, 2005

WASHINGTON -- Senator Edward M. Kennedy yesterday blasted Governor Mitt Romney's proposal to ban the cloning of embryos for stem cell research, saying the governor's approach would rob Massachusetts of the benefits of one of the most promising areas of scientific research.......
Kennedy rips Romney over stem cell policy

I'm sure it's hard to disprove something that Mitt goes around proudly proclaiming all the time.

Mitt Romney does not "proudly proclaim" things that are socially liberal "all the time". He speaks as a social conservative and his record isn't far behind what he is currently saying. Some premiere social conservatives have endorsed or expressed their support for Mitt Romney. Ann Coulter likes him and has expressed support. Jay Sekulow founded Evangelicals for Mitt to support him. Even James Dobson likes him and may support him. He's not the liberal that some would pretend he is.

But it would amuse me to see the depths of denial to which the Mitt-worshippers have sunk.

There you go again with the juvenile "Mitt-worshipper" stuff. Can you discuss this rationally and without the sophomoric pejoratives?