Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Miltie
So the healthy young person who logically shouldn’t buy health insurance (because their opportunity cost for their cash is high, and their likelihood of getting sick is low) cannot opt out.

Health insurance doesn't just cover "getting sick". And young people get sick too. The problem with being uninsured is that if you get injured or sick and you refused to get health insurance, then you become a burden on the state. The idea is to reduce that burden.

79 posted on 09/06/2007 9:12:03 AM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Spiff
"The problem with being uninsured is that if you get injured or sick and you refused to get health insurance, then you become a burden on the state."

Not true.

A young person can rely on Dad, Loans, Churches, selling the car, etc.

And why should an older wealthy person have to show proof of self-insurability to anyone? Whose business is it that proof of my financial health is a required to avoid a government mandate?

Y'all just slid partway down the slippery slope. I'd rather stay off of it.

80 posted on 09/06/2007 9:17:43 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson