Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Great article. Read it over and over. Forward it to friends, family, and enemies.
1 posted on 09/06/2007 7:04:39 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Phantom Lord
Whenever I hear someone crowing about "giving back" I can't escape the thought they're the beneficiary of some ill gotten gain and are returning something like .00001% of what they walked off. For their generosity they expect to be treated like God's gift to the human race.

I'll be happy to stand corrected if somebody can point out that his hedge fund was lending at less than prime rates to his sub prime borrowers but I suspect he was realizing a generous rate of return (probably further leveraged) and was being very well compensated as long as the gravy train was rolling.

2 posted on 09/06/2007 7:25:39 AM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord
So right after the Bear Stearns funds blew up, I had a thought: This is what happens when you lend money to poor people.

BS ALERT!!!! It was not the "poor." It was the greedy and people who had no hope to pay these mortgages. There are alot of "rich" people in that category...

5 posted on 09/06/2007 7:51:15 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord

Excellent article.


9 posted on 09/06/2007 8:07:56 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord

LMAO. Hilarious article and unfortunately true. I think the biggest mistake the mortgage people made was inventing this neutral word “subprime.” We used to call it B-C-D lending, making it clear that these borrowers had bad credit histories that most lenders would not touch with a ten foot pole. Investors found it too easy to ignore that and just reassure themselves that “subprime” was OK.


10 posted on 09/06/2007 8:08:34 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Thanks anyway, Nancy, but we already have a Commander-in-Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord

Wow, that’s good reading.


11 posted on 09/06/2007 8:10:47 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Libs: killing a windfarm is bad, letting a gal die in your Caddy is not so bad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord

I think some are missing that this piece is dripping with sarcasm and is largely a satirical work. Lewis makes points on both sides of the argument in the process. To strongly agree or disagree with him is to fall into his trap and become a target of his derision.


14 posted on 09/06/2007 8:22:01 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord

20 posted on 09/06/2007 8:44:31 AM PDT by Gritty (Politics is the second oldest profession. It bears a striking resemblance to the first-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson