Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lduucckkyy
By the time Baghdad fell on April 9, 2003, the Iraqi Army had simply dissolved. On April 17 Gen. John Abizaid, the deputy commander of the Army’s Central Command, reported in a video briefing to officials in Washington that “there are no organized Iraqi military units left.” The disappearance of Saddam Hussein’s old army rendered irrelevant any prewar plans to use that army. So the question was whether the Coalition Provisional Authority should try to recall it or to build a new one open to both vetted members of the old army and new recruits. General Abizaid favored the second approach.

I've attended talks by a major (may be a lt. colonel now) in Central Command who blames most of the problems in Iraq on Bremer. We made no attempt to call back the Iraqi Army and get them on a payroll and on our side. The only people willing to pay them were those interested in having them cause us trouble. A couple of times he needed some Iraqi troops, so he contacted the old commander and executive officer and got 85% of the unit back together within a couple of days.

If we had recalled the Iraqi military, got as many of them back into the barracks, paid them better than they were under Saddam and worried about de-Baathifying them later, they would have been available for both security and reconstruction work (and far cheaper than our contractors).

As it was, we had a bunch of armed, newly poor people with families to support. It would have been far cheaper both in money and lives to have paid them.

(No, I won't name him. One of the conditions for attending the talk was to not refer to him by name.)

4 posted on 09/06/2007 8:43:27 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

Bremer’s book is very interesting. It is all about people he met with and worked with. He worked to reach out to a broad spectrum of Iraqis and bring them into leadership to create a provisional government. That should work out a lot better than military rule ever does.


6 posted on 09/06/2007 9:03:16 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio
Karl, I've heard just the opposite from high-ranking officers. So you can't use that as a basis for a judgment. The problem is, the army (as in ALL middle eastern countries) was associated with the regime. It wasn't an "Iraqi" army---it was SADDAM'S army. Every one of them had to be vetted, because if you didn't, you would have had all sorts of al-Qaeda types infiltrated the "new" army and the deaths would have been horrendous.

If you thought our guys were vulnerable with the disbanded army, it would have been 100 times worse with "embedded" al-Qaeda getting into the Green Zone on a regular basis as officers in the Iraqi army.

10 posted on 09/06/2007 10:11:17 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson