And this tactic supports the legitimate constitutional process how exactly?
I’m just pointing out that it’s the pot calling the kettle black in this instance.
And it doesn’t have to “support a constitutional process”. Anyway, the sites are ether one person one vote, in which case it’s whoever gets the most people on before it closes, or they allow more than one, in which case they really only want it for back patting purposes and it’s observationally worthless.
What are you looking for, McCain/Feingold for the Internet???