Oh, so that is why Paul introduces a bill to withdraw the U.S. from the UN every new congress and why he was one of only 87 congressman to vote to withdraw the U.S. from the UN back in, I think it was 2005?
Meanwhile, not a word from Bush supporting the U.S. leaving the UN. Nope. Instead Bush wants the U.S. Senate to pass the Law Of the Sea Treaty (LOST). LOST is another UN powergrab (this time of the oceans) that Reagan opposed.
When it comes to love of the UN, Bush has Paul beat.
All of Ron Paul’s anti-globalist credentials were flushed the moment he said “it’s illegal under international law. That’s where I take my marching orders...”
Did Ron Paul or did not Ron Paul say that Iran is no threat and we should listen to the IAEA during that debate? He went out of his way. Why don’t you address what people are actually saying rather than projecting on to something else? You do this repeatedly, and I suspect you know this because there is absolutely no way to defend the things Paul said, so you try to pretend it wasn’t said and try to switch the discussion. What’s the purpose?