Googling is good. The study was jumped on and branded as truth by Galloway and Ramsey Clark. Your reading ability is no good.
The survey was conducted again in May and July of 2006.
That's cute even though there were no sampling points. How can one conduct a survey when it wasn't a survey? The study was written at the time.
Again, over 1,000 dead every day. Only Ron turd and his deluded minions would believe such a number.
Indeed, it is. In fact, it was only after googling for some kind of official connection between Galloway and the research, and coming up empty, that I pressed you for a source.
The study was jumped on and branded as truth by Galloway and Ramsey Clark. Your reading ability is no good.
In other words. Galloway was not, in fact, affiliated with the study in any way.
That's cute even though there were no sampling points. How can one conduct a survey when it wasn't a survey? The study was written at the time.
From the summary of the study:
MethodsBTW, shall I take it, based on your silence, that you have no source for your claim that The Lancet "reported that the US government and Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks"?Between May and July, 2006, we did a national cross-sectional cluster sample survey of mortality in Iraq. 50 clusters were randomly selected from 16 Governorates, with every cluster consisting of 40 households.