I never indicated that it was, but rather it was supported by Galloway and Ramsey Clarke.
Between May and July, 2006, we did a national cross-sectional cluster sample survey of mortality in Iraq. 50 clusters were randomly selected from 16 Governorates, with every cluster consisting of 40 households.
That's to determine HH mortality average. That has nothing to do with deaths casued by hostile action from March 2003. Did you actually think that morgue reporting for three months would determine violent deaths from march 2003? That's one of the plethora of reasons this study was discounted.
I take it by your silence that you can't account for 1,00)+ deaths in Iraq per day?
An utterly meaningless claim. The fact that some people you don't like approved of the research after the fact is not an indictment of its methods or conclusions.
That's to determine HH mortality average. That has nothing to do with deaths casued by hostile action from March 2003. Did you actually think that morgue reporting for three months would determine violent deaths from march 2003?
It wasn't morgue reporting, and the research didn't look only at deaths that occurred during that 3 month period. You're still batting .000 in this thread on your factual claims.
I take it by your silence that you can't account for 1,00)+ deaths in Iraq per day?
I never said there were 1,000 deaths per day. That's a number you came up based on your dishonest claim that the 2006 study only went through November, 2004. As you now know, it covered a much longer period of time.
Fifth request now - do you have a source for your claim that the Lancet "reported that the US government and Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks"?