Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CheyennePress
“Government shouldn’t be telling you they’re going to tax you on your savings.”

I agree, but why then does he limit it to those making less than $200K/year. If it’s wrong for those making less than this arbitrary limit, it’s wrong for those making more.

Class warfare is no way to get my vote.

11 posted on 09/08/2007 11:32:12 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: vetsvette

Ahhhhh.... all the purists come out of the woodwork. :)

I thought $200,000 was pretty generous, frankly. I was expecting about $150,000.

As far as addressing the issue of social security, I think this is a very good start. Knocking down the incentives to save makes saving all the more economical to spending. And really, once you get much beyond the daily costs of living, it becomes far easier to save.

The Citizens for Tax Justice guy was complaining that this didn’t help out the average American enough because he “only” makes $43,000, and this goes to $200k. I managed to put back some money when I was making far less than average.

The point is to encourage Americans to save and to wean them from government dependence. I think this would be a huge step in the right direction. And as someone a few years away from embarking on a professional career, this sounds pretty nice about now.


17 posted on 09/08/2007 11:51:34 AM PDT by CheyennePress (Tennesseeans for Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson