Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vadim Perelman To Rewrite And Direct "Atlas Shrugged"
allheadlinenews.com ^ | September 6, 2007 | Shaveta Bansal

Posted on 09/09/2007 9:59:29 AM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: grundle
Image hosted by Photobucket.com Atlas PUKED!!!
21 posted on 09/09/2007 10:32:53 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Philistone

“...I’m afraid it’s going to be a major disappointment.”

How in the world can the people behind “Day After” and “Fahrenheit” possible get Ayn Rand right? At the very least, they’re gonna try to “clean her up” and make her “more acceptable” etc.


22 posted on 09/09/2007 10:33:05 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I look forward to the film

Been waiting for decades - it's been 50 years! But if it's not a mini series, there's no way it can be done right. And I'd like to see someone else other than AJ to play the female lead.

Actually, I'd like to see an unknown - I'm sure there are many accomplished actresses who could pull it off. With an new face, the character of the story would stand out and the viewer would not be constantly aware - "this is Jolie."

Hoping the same for whoever is chosen for Galt, Reardon, Ragnar, etc.

Most readers of Atlas - and Ayn Rand's Objectivist philosophy that sums up 'somewhat' in the line : ""I swear that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another to live for mine." - interpret this as the ultimate in selfishness.

I see it differently - remembering Roarks soliloquy from "The Fountainhead" where he states that no one has a right to the work of his mind except with his permission.

I am an artist. I do not, will not, paint what and how someone else thinks I should. Let them paint what they want themselves. I will not ask anyone else to paint my way. End result: If I put out paintings, according to my own vision, and they are good - then other people can enjoy and benefit from my work. Therefore, by following my 'drummer' my talent, my vision, others DO benefit.

If I try to please others by painting the way they think it should be done, the vision that makes it worth a fig, is gone - and no one benefits.

It's not selfishness.

The other side of the coin, the one the libRats preach, is 'servitude' to the masses - which is what the libRAts would like you to think they are all about. That's called Socialism/Communism. Surely, Ann Rand was an expert on the evils of Communism and the steps that take a society there. (She taught Ronald Reagan - and we know how that benefited the world.)

When individuals follow their talents - whether in art, literature, medical field, industrial, etc,. if they strive for the best they can be/accomplish in their field - then society reaps the benefits. Everyone gains, without servitude, submission or rule from the top aka Socialism/Communism

23 posted on 09/09/2007 10:37:37 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I fully expect a pro-big government, socialist, collectivist re-imagining of Ayn Rand.


24 posted on 09/09/2007 10:37:51 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
probably still trying to hire Arnold to play the part of Atlas

LOL

you forgot the sarq/, right? You do know there's no Atlas role...

25 posted on 09/09/2007 10:40:30 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
Actually, I'd like to see an unknown - I'm sure there are many accomplished actresses who could pull it off. With an new face, the character of the story would stand out and the viewer would not be constantly aware - "this is Jolie."

I know what you mean. A good actor/actress comes across as the character and not as themselves.

DeNiro as Harry Tuttle in the film "brazil" comes to mind

26 posted on 09/09/2007 10:40:53 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

I’ve read somewhere that both Jolie and Brad Pitt (scheduled to play John Galt or Hank Reardon) “loved the book.” Judging by their actions, though, I don’t think they actually understood it. Makes me VERY skeptical about any film that comes out.


27 posted on 09/09/2007 10:40:58 AM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Too bad they didn’t film this in Lauren Bacall’s heyday. She’s exactly what I pictured Dagney being like.

you are exactly right!

28 posted on 09/09/2007 10:41:43 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Being a youngin’ Lauren Bacall will always be the voice of “Fancy Feast” cat food.


29 posted on 09/09/2007 10:43:33 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Aaaaaaauuugggghhhhh....


30 posted on 09/09/2007 10:50:37 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Being a youngin’ Lauren Bacall will always be the voice of “Fancy Feast” cat food.

LOL

Oh dear. You need to deprogram - rent the movies "Starstruck", "To Have and Have Not", and one of my favorites: "Key Largo" etc -

31 posted on 09/09/2007 10:53:33 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Yah, Lillian Reardon, I could see her as adequate in that role. Or Betty Pope. Wait, wait...CHERYL Taggart, that's it, the poor shop clerk whom Jim Taggart marries. PERFECT!

What's **REALLY** wrong with casting her as Dagny is that the book specifically states that Dagny is 35. The Jolie twit can't be more than 27, I shouldn't think.

32 posted on 09/09/2007 10:54:23 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Lena Headey from “300”


33 posted on 09/09/2007 10:54:36 AM PDT by Ceebass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Love Key Largo, particularly as it stars one of my personal favorites, Edward G. Robinson. He stole that movie just as he did “The Cincinatti Kid.”


34 posted on 09/09/2007 10:56:22 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Wan't talking about liberal actots. Talking about rotten casting. Jolie is almost a decade too young to play Dagny and same thing with Pitt...well, aside from the fact that Pitt's the antithesis of Henry Reardon.

Pitt would be good as Gene Lawson, the incompetent ''banker with a heart''.

35 posted on 09/09/2007 10:56:57 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ceebass

Very nice


36 posted on 09/09/2007 10:58:04 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

Meh...

They gotta sex it up a bit I suppose


37 posted on 09/09/2007 10:59:24 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Gee, what’s the hurry? It’s only been 50 years or so. Besides, it written with a futuristic setting; 1965 or something like that. You know, diesel trains, phone booths that can access long distance operators, etc. Slow down!

(Just kidding. Still, I wonder how they’ll handle the “futuristic” aspects of the novel?)


38 posted on 09/09/2007 11:01:31 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Eh? There’s quite a bit of sex in that book...oh, I see, you meant by **today’s** standards.


39 posted on 09/09/2007 11:02:11 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
I am an artist. I do not, will not, paint what and how someone else thinks I should.

Which is why I did not become a commercial artist L0L. The thought of being told to do the "VanCamps Beans" ad when its not in my heart was enough to make me not got there.

Whats your main medium?

40 posted on 09/09/2007 11:03:18 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson