[JSDude1]

Nope; I am just saying the can be tested under light of (empirical) creation science theory!

[GunRunner]

Nope; I am just saying the can be tested under light of (empirical) creation science theory!

Well, there is no scientific evidence for a worldwide flood 4500 years ago.

Injecting the supernatural into genetics and the fossil record would by its very nature take away the empiricism of the scientific study of those fields.

[49th]

What you ask for was done for several hundred years during the Enlightenment. Scientists worked hard to find empirical evidence for biblical history in the earth. The result was the recognition that the evidence is not there. What is there is evidence for Uniformitarian geology, Evolution, Big-Bang cosmology, etc.

Also, you will note that never do any of the creationists on this board, or anywhere else for that matter, present evidence which supports their position. They merely point out areas of disagreement amongst evolutionists. Why do they do this? Because they have nothing else. There is no evidence supporting literal biblical history, only evidence that we haven’t yet figured out exactly how things did happen.