Replies

Maybe this can be the basis of SPIDERMAN IV.

1 posted on 09/10/2007 4:44:06 PM PDT by doug from upland

To: doug from upland

Doug,

I appreciate your commitment to this issue, but don’t think that reporters have been vigorously pursuing the Hsu matter.

2 posted on 09/10/2007 4:50:44 PM PDT by bolobaby

To: doug from upland

3 posted on 09/10/2007 5:01:53 PM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)

To: doug from upland

Stan Lee never had a hundred thousand dollars my ass.
I am so disappointed to find out that the inventor of so many comic book heroes is nothing more than a patsy for Lexie Luthor.

5 posted on 09/10/2007 5:05:43 PM PDT by mnehring (Thompson/Hunter '08- Time to have the real men in charge!)

To: doug from upland; martin_fierro; Mr. Silverback

"I never had a hundred thousand dollars to donate to anybody!"

"[Stan] Lee in 2005 filed a lawsuit against Marvel for his unpaid share of profits from Marvel movies, winning a settlement of more than $10 million."

Oopsie. ;)

6 posted on 09/10/2007 5:10:02 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")

To: doug from upland

Heads up Doug... this is a bad link:

SOURCE FOR DOCUMENTS AND THE ENTIRE SORDID SCANDAL

7 posted on 09/10/2007 5:10:48 PM PDT by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)

To: doug from upland

I long for the day you will be remembered as the guy who brought down the Clinton crime family.

8 posted on 09/10/2007 5:12:35 PM PDT by pierstroll

To: doug from upland

Stan Lee, an icon of media itself, was never a smart guy with his financial interests. He was leveraged into a buyout of Marvel for a relative pittance while being threatened with infringement lawsuits every time he forayed into new publishing ideas (costumes, secret identities...it got very foolish). Frankly I’m amazed they let Stan continue having cameo appearances in every Marvel film.

If the man is guilty of wrongdoing in his contributions by all means go after him. I just point out that he’s very disassociated with reality as most of us know it and probably took some bad advice for granted because - all his public life he’s championed truth, justice and the heroic way (nerdy as that may seem). His cable show, “Who Wants To Be a SuperHero” stresses these values over all else and the guy obviously agonizes over choosing one contestant over another on the basis of their positive values.

I can’t believe Stan Lee’s capable of disassociating those values in regard to his real-life actions. I truly suspect this is another case of villainous agents of the Democrat Party snookering another well-off person out of money while leaving them with the “smoking gun”. Shades of Whitewater.

11 posted on 09/10/2007 5:32:22 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus

To: doug from upland

15 posted on 09/10/2007 5:38:55 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)

To: doug from upland

Doug,

Sorry to be tuning in so late, but what happened in court on the 7th (vis a vis the Peter Paul case against the Clintons(?

17 posted on 09/10/2007 6:23:24 PM PDT by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794