Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China inflation spikes to near 11-year high
The Financial Times ^ | 9/11/2007

Posted on 09/10/2007 11:29:30 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2007 11:29:32 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

...and nothing about the yuan. That’s interesting.


2 posted on 09/10/2007 11:46:42 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Thanks for posting this.. it adds further evidence to my thinking that inflation isn’t under control globally. And this is a global economy.. rising prices in China will get here eventually. The Chinese government will looks like have to keep raising interest rates, and hopefully continue raising the reserve requirement, as imo is a good idea.

Its interesting to note that they include food in their calculation while we do not. The Chinese will likely also try mechanisms to lower the price of food, to buffer the affects on their poor masses. And so there isn’t so much pressure to raise.

I think folks here in North America and also in Europe are too optimistic that we are going to see lots of rate cuts going forward.


3 posted on 09/10/2007 11:54:57 PM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
"...and nothing about the yuan."

Are the ChiComs printing too many yawns or renminbis?

Do Red Chinese in rural areas buy rice with yawns or renminbis? One greenback buys about 7.54 yawns. How many renminbis in a yawn?

yitbos

4 posted on 09/10/2007 11:56:17 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop
A rising Yuan would also help the situation so they could import food more easily when shortages appeared in certain foods.

The Yuan rose about 5.5% over the last 12 months..

5 posted on 09/10/2007 11:59:13 PM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The Yuan probably figures in the Hsu DNC Hillary Clinton $850,000.00 story. They’re not talking about Yuan that much there either though. Heh heh heh...


6 posted on 09/11/2007 12:22:59 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ran20
"The Yuan rose about 5.5% over the last 12 months."

The chart appears to show the yawn floating, down. Yet it is pegged to the buck. If the greenback falls, how can the yawn rise?

yitbos

7 posted on 09/11/2007 12:23:36 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

As I understand it, the renminbi is the Chinese yuan as discerned from the new Taiwan dollar.

I don’t know whether making too many of them would keep the currency down on the world market. But my uneducated guess is that if Chinese workers have to pay more for their products, so will American importers, eventually. It appears that the dollar must fall.

And as more workers become active in new production in China and other countries, more of them will be commuting. It doesn’t look like oil will go down in the long term.

Yours,

familyop, AKA Captain Obvious, the uneducated macro-macro-macro economist (’cause it’s so easy. ...too bad that it doesn’t pay)


8 posted on 09/11/2007 12:26:49 AM PDT by familyop (U.S cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, goy, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ran20

Thank you.


9 posted on 09/11/2007 12:27:33 AM PDT by familyop (U.S cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

1.00 CNY (China yuan renminbi) = 0.13295 USD

at ~ 3:29 AM ET (Reuters)

http://today.reuters.com/Investing/Currencies.aspx


10 posted on 09/11/2007 12:31:36 AM PDT by familyop (U.S cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
The chart appears to show the yawn floating, down. Yet it is pegged to the buck. If the greenback falls, how can the yawn rise?

In 2005 the Chinese broke the absolute peg with the dollar which was at 8.28 yuan per dollar. But they made it so the Yuan could only move .1% up or down each trading day. Then later they made it so the Yuan could move .3% up or down each day. And they may have made an additional loosening of controls since then.

I like how China gradually makes changes, ending at the eventual goal.. without one chaotic leap with disastrous impact.

11 posted on 09/11/2007 12:33:55 AM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; ran20
"The chart appears to show the yawn floating, down."

It shows the number of yuan on the dollar. Divide 1 by 7.5, and you'll see a figure near what I posted in my last comment.


12 posted on 09/11/2007 12:36:22 AM PDT by familyop (U.S cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ran20

“I like how China gradually makes changes, ending at the eventual goal.. without one chaotic leap with disastrous impact.”

A freedom of movement much easier when your every fiscal move doesn’t prompt harmful-to-you hysteria.


13 posted on 09/11/2007 12:38:32 AM PDT by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Ooops. Sorry. Make that 7.5216246709289206468597216998872 yaun to the buck, not 7.54. I know the big boys go 12 digits to the right of the decimal because they deal in trillions.

But I did say "about".

yitbos

14 posted on 09/11/2007 12:40:08 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

LOL! We rural macro-macro-macro economists only reckon in the master-of-the-universe way. [IOW, all those digits made my Dukes-of-Hazard head hurt.]


15 posted on 09/11/2007 1:01:09 AM PDT by familyop (U.S cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ran20
I like how China gradually makes changes, ending at the eventual goal.. without one chaotic leap with disastrous impact.

Mao's Cultural Revolution showed them that big changes, even popular ones that sound good, can be traumatic if the occur too quickly. That's how the CCP can get away with promising slow advances for social freedoms... and even then, only after the economic freedoms have been "sufficiently advanced". In reality, this means the obvious: that the CCP will allow those freeedoms only when the population screams for them and the CCP is actually threatened... and while everyone is either enjoying the new wealth or trying to get in on the action, they aren't likely to complain too much about free speech (etc) that they've never known anyway.

16 posted on 09/11/2007 1:08:51 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ran20
I like how China gradually makes changes, ending at the eventual goal.. without one chaotic leap with disastrous impact.

Exactly. I can see the higher prices right now (I'm in Shanghai at the moment), and inflation is higher than in the US. However, their economy is growing even faster.

A GDP growth of 3% with a 2% inflation rate is much worse than a GDP growth of 10% with a 5% inflation rate.

China's economy is nearly as free-market as the US at this point, and you see a lot of pressures to open up the other aspects of life. China's opened Pandora's box of capitalism, and right now I get the feeling the leaders here aren't so much fighting the loss of a communist society as trying to manage the change to a socialist (think Germany or France style) government with the least harm to the country.

The Chinese, for anything else, are highly pragmatic people. The writing's on the wall that a free market and open society are the only ways they will grow in terms of international power and position, and so the problem is how to transition there with the least disruption to the day-to-day realities.

TIC - This Is China.

17 posted on 09/11/2007 1:53:38 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Tagline: Kinda like a chorus line but without the legs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
A GDP growth of 3% with a 2% inflation rate is much worse than a GDP growth of 10% with a 5% inflation rate Er, I wouldn't say that at all. It's far more complex than that. In a developed economy with broader wealth distribution (I'm not talking about peaks and valleys, I'm talking about a wider spread in the middle) and decent growth, a few points of inflation annually are the norm and pass by relatively unnoticed for the majority. (Save for spikes in something like, oh, gas.) 5% is not better than 3% simply because GDP is growing more rapidly, most especially when the majority of your population is not benefitting proportionately from that GDP increase _and_ is starting from a very low point in the first place. (Versus a mature economy where inflation outpacing rises in income can more readily be absorbed for an extended period of time by average consumers.)
18 posted on 09/11/2007 2:05:40 AM PDT by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
We have been exporting our inflation to China because they refuse to revalue their currency.

We will wake up one morning to discover that the US govt has drastically devalued the dollar overnight. That is how it usually happens to a banana republic.


BUMP

19 posted on 09/11/2007 2:21:49 AM PDT by capitalist229 (ANDS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sandreckoner

In China right now, it’s the bottom of the income scale that’s heavily gaining in income. Minimum wage requirements in Guangdong province (where 20% of China’s exports are made) are up - again. Up 20% over the last year. That’s one of the reasons a small shortage in pork creates such a spike now, unlike 6-8 years ago; so many of the working class can now afford pork on a daily basis that demand has greatly grown.

And these labor laws are strictly enforced; one factory I work with over here was audited, forced to pay back wages, and fined double the total of back wages. It’s not the US or the EU, but it’s a lot better than it was 10 years ago, and better than Mexico, India, South America (save for Chile), and other places with heavy exports.

The richest in China are doing fabulously, and you can still live like a king of $3000/month. But the lower rungs are quickly climbing, evidenced by sudden jumps in food prices and housing costs, because they can afford these items. In fact, labor costs have increased so much that some companies are pulling out and moving operations to Vietnam and Cambodia, with even lower labor costs.


20 posted on 09/11/2007 2:23:34 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Tagline: Kinda like a chorus line but without the legs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson