[redgirlinabluestate]

The anti-Fred site started ages ago, by those associated with the Brownback campaign (conservativesgainstfred.wordpress.com), was much more cut-throat and devoid of any humor. Yet, it barely raised an eyebrow around here. Why not? Maybe because the Fredheads aren't threatened by Brownback?

There are anti sites out there on every candidate. In this day and age, it seems a little naive (and thin-skinned) not to expect it.

It is nothing compared to what the Clinton machine will dish out. If you can't stand the heat....

Wonder where all the articles are about Brownback's anti-Fred website?

Just like usual, anything Romney is treated with a double-standard by Fredheads.

[prairiebreeze]

Actually, even Romney doesn’t have any reason to be threatened by Brownback either, if that’s your standard.

But why are you crabbing and the Fredheads? The tactic was underhanded and don’t you think that people who are purportedly on the same ultimate side could agree on that and condemn them?

Additionally, I’ll be interested to see you provide links to anti-candidate sites that the Thompson campaign is behind.

[prairiebreeze]

Allow me to correct my second sentence, sorry for the additional post.

But why are you crabbing at the Fredheads? The tactic was underhanded and don’t you think that people who are purportedly on the same ultimate side could agree on that and condemn it?

[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

Just like usual, anything Romney is treated with a double-standard by Fredheads.

Perhaps you're right. We have one standard for the old, pre-flipflop Mitt, and the other standard is for the new, post-flipflop Mitt....