No he didn't. He just claimed he wasn't responsible.
"The site was not affiliated with our campaign, but we did make it clear that we did not approve of the site, strongly disavowed it and made sure that it had absolutely no connection to our campaign whatsoever. We took immediate action once we were alerted to it."
I think in one case in THIS article, they quoted "approve the site" instead of "approve of the site", but strongly disavowing is also a pretty good statement against it.