[CharlesWayneCT]

You have ANY evidence of a conspiracy here? Or just a theory unsupported by facts that fits your world view?

A funny thing to think of on a day when another group is ridiculed for their conspiracy theories.

IN fact, it’s so easy to see “right through this” that it seems almost incredulous to believe it was a “conspiracy”.

You don’t think Romney, who has had no trouble saying bad things about others directly, needs to have some 3rd-party operative putting this stuff out? The bloggers are already doing this stuff, everything on the site apparently was just like stuff people here at FR have already dug up.

You think Romney, had he wanted to do this, would have had to use a business associate of a paid advisor? You don’t think he could find a volunteer somewhere who had access to a web address?

[kevkrom]

You don’t think Romney, who has had no trouble saying bad things about others directly, needs to have some 3rd-party operative putting this stuff out?

Like "Evangelicals for Mitt"?

Let's break it down, shall we?

1. The website recycles all of the same slimes previously trotted out by Romney fronts such as "Evangelicals for Mitt"
2. The site was created and hosted using the company resources of one of Romney's senior advisers, and created by that adviser's business partner
3. Immediately after the Washington Post contacts the Romney campaign about the site, it is taken down
4. The Romney campaign issues a denial of any involvement, but fails to denounce the tactic nor fire the consulting company

You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to think that the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.