No, the evidence for the assertion that the story is still reverberating is the article quoted in the post that keeps tying the attack to Romney. That’s only one article of several that are out this morning. This is still happening a full two days after being found out and after Romney spent an entire day yesterday trying to put it behind him.
Fluff, in other words. Where is the hard evidence?
You're arguing that perception is a pragmatic reality - which it is in politics - but it's not truth. To fan these flames without hard evidence is dishonest.
According to your logic, when the Republican nominee is determined and the MSM unloads on them with scores of anti-Republican articles, I should listen to them 'because of the shear quantity of articles'.
YOu guys apologize to Rudy yet for accusing HIM of this attack?