Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBattman

It wouldn’t.
EVERYONE would get a monthly check, totalling for the year to .23 X 20k ($4600).

If you don’t spend 20k in a year, well, you’re getting money, a negative sales tax, so to speak.

And, since (with the simultaneous repeal of the 16th) the gov’t no longer can demand that you disclose your income, they can’t give differing rebates to different income levels.

I’d much prefer this to the intrusiveness of the present system and the EITC (which makes for a NEGATIVE income tax on some).


10 posted on 09/12/2007 5:34:49 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

I think it’s great, but the prebate really worries me. I can easily see the Dems increasing this prebate up and up and up.... ‘fer der poor’


11 posted on 09/12/2007 5:54:30 AM PDT by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: MrB
And, since (with the simultaneous repeal of the 16th) the gov’t no longer can demand that you disclose your income, they can’t give differing rebates to different income levels.
There is no "simultaneous repeal of the 16th" and your employer and self-employed would report earnings to Social Security...which happens to be the government agency that would be sending the (GAG!) "prebate" checks.
27 posted on 09/12/2007 2:27:02 PM PDT by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson