Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to “interpret” the treaty when there’s a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.


20 posted on 09/12/2007 2:14:14 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Do not wish ill for your enemies, plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: PeterFinn

Thanks fir citing your characterization.....I hope you’re just plain wrong.


21 posted on 09/12/2007 2:24:43 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: PeterFinn

>>NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to “interpret” the treaty when there’s a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.<<

The senate amendment mandated how the money is to be spent on a spending bill. Surely the NAFTA arbitration board cannot ignore the Constitution?

From Article 9 of the Constitution:

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;

So how can they spend money without appropriations?


29 posted on 09/12/2007 7:42:52 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: PeterFinn

>>NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to “interpret” the treaty when there’s a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.<<

It’s not a treaty. It’s an “agreement.” Big difference.


30 posted on 09/12/2007 7:45:21 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: PeterFinn
NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to “interpret” the treaty when there’s a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.

Note that the House vote was 234-200 and the Senate vote was 61-38.

A treaty requires no House concurrence but does require the concurrence of 2/3s of the Senators "present." [U. S. Constitution - Article II; Section 2].

Two-thirds of the Senate present for the NAFTA vote did not concur. The Bill was passed but no treaty was authorized.

NAFTA is not a treaty.

NAFTA has the force of law. As with any law, it can be changed or abolished with the passage of another law.


U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 103rd Congress - 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the SenateVote Summary

Question: On Passage of the Bill (H.R.3450 )
Vote Number: 395 Vote Date: November 20, 1993, 07:28 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Bill Passed
Measure Number: H.R. 3450
Measure Title: A bill to implement the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Vote Counts: YEAs 61

NAYs 38

Not Voting 1

More details on Senate vote here: U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote:

U. S. House FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 575
(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)

      H R 3450      RECORDED VOTE      17-Nov-1993      10:36 PM
      QUESTION:  On Passage
      BILL TITLE: NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACT


Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 102 156    
Republican 132 43    
Independent   1    
TOTALS 234 200    

More details on the House vote here: Final Vote Results for Roll Call 575


31 posted on 09/12/2007 8:44:07 PM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson