To: Vn_survivor_67-68
NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to “interpret” the treaty when there’s a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.
20 posted on
09/12/2007 2:14:14 PM PDT by
PeterFinn
(Do not wish ill for your enemies, plan it.)
To: PeterFinn
Thanks fir citing your characterization.....I hope you’re just plain wrong.
To: PeterFinn
>>NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to interpret the treaty when theres a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.<<
The senate amendment mandated how the money is to be spent on a spending bill. Surely the NAFTA arbitration board cannot ignore the Constitution?
From Article 9 of the Constitution:
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;
So how can they spend money without appropriations?
29 posted on
09/12/2007 7:42:52 PM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
To: PeterFinn
>>NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to interpret the treaty when theres a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.<<
It’s not a treaty. It’s an “agreement.” Big difference.
30 posted on
09/12/2007 7:45:21 PM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
To: PeterFinn
NAFTA empowered unelected and unaccountable arbitrators to interpret the treaty when theres a dispute. Therefore the treaty says whatever they want it to.
Note that the House vote was 234-200 and the Senate vote was 61-38.
A treaty requires no House concurrence but does require the concurrence of 2/3s of the Senators "present." [U. S. Constitution - Article II; Section 2].
Two-thirds of the Senate present for the NAFTA vote did not concur. The Bill was passed but no treaty was authorized.
NAFTA is not a treaty.
NAFTA has the force of law. As with any law, it can be changed or abolished with the passage of another law.
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 103rd Congress - 1st Sessionas compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the SenateVote Summary
Question: On Passage of the Bill (H.R.3450 ) |
Vote Number: |
395 |
Vote Date: |
November 20, 1993, 07:28 PM |
Required For Majority: |
1/2 |
Vote Result: |
Bill Passed |
Measure Number: |
H.R. 3450 |
Measure Title: |
A bill to implement the North American Free Trade Agreement. |
Vote Counts: |
YEAs |
61 |
|
NAYs |
38 |
|
Not Voting |
1 |
More details on Senate vote here:
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote:
U. S. House FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 575
(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)
H R 3450 RECORDED VOTE 17-Nov-1993 10:36 PM
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACT
|
|
|
|
|
Democratic |
102 |
156 |
|
|
Republican |
132 |
43 |
|
|
Independent |
|
1 |
|
|
|
234 |
200 |
|
|
More details on the House vote here:
Final Vote Results for Roll Call 575
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson