Skip to comments.Britain Demands More Muslims
Posted on 09/12/2007 5:41:56 PM PDT by Lorianne
The new Foreign Minister of Britain is either a brilliant liar or a fool. The trouble is, even he may not know which it is.
David Milliband, a rising politician in British Labour (the socialist party of Britain), has demanded Turkish entry into the European Union. Turkish entry means free and unbounded immigration rights for 70 million Turkish Muslims into any EU member country. Since income per capita for Turkey is less than $10,000, the incentive for an enormous wave of Muslim migration will be unstoppable. It is civilizational suicide for Europe.
For that reason millions of Europeans are having second thoughts about Turkish membership in the EU. Even Nicolas Sarkozy, the President of France, only wants "associate membership" for Turkey. Turkey just elected a radical Muslim as President, who has spent time in jail for Islamist political agitation.Abdullah Gul simply tells the world that there is no such thing as a "moderate Muslim" as far as he is concerned: There is only one true Islam -- and you know what that means for the infidels of this world.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
As is so often said on FR, I’ll take the liberty of saying it again:
“Europe is finished”.
And they wonder why British (and American) children are obese. It’s not safe to go out and play. Imagine how much safer for the British it will be, if this happens.
The world doesn’t need more Muslims. It needs fewer.
I’d rather see more cancer than more muslims... wait: that’s redundant.
That reminds me... I need more punches to my face...
It always amazes when Jews of all people would promote Muslims into anything.
The US republican establishment needs to tarred & feathered & run out of town.after w retires no bush should ever be in government again. the US needs to stop NAU SPP bs and the brits need to stop shoving turkey down eu’s throat.
may the Lord please save us from upper class twits.
I didn't know that!
what does p a y o l a spell?
in this case suicide!
If this were the Britain of Sir Winston Churchill, the call for more Muslims would be like that Marine major on Wake Island in early 1942 who demanded,
“Send us more Japs!”
(Aloha snackbar, y’all towelhead muzzies can kiss my pork rinds!)
These elites always think that they and their offspring will always be insulated from whatever happens by their gated communities, estates, limos, Lear jets, etc. They never consider the fate of Rome. All they do is look at polls. If they do read history books, I’m sure it is the newer, PC versions of the last 30 years—nothing prior to that.
From USA: Please take our Muslims before they destroy the world...
Britain is a lost cause.
We should not allow them access to nuclear weaponry in the future.
Your a contradictory bloke, Axlrose, you know. You slag Britain off as a recent ‘lost cause’ ‘a great nation fallen’ in one post and then in the next, you bash the UK citng examples in history as far back as WW2, WW1 and the Napoleonic era. So tell me, mate, at what juncture in the Axlrose history of the United Kingdom (now available in paperback) did the UK collapse? Was it about the time that the Beatles split, heralding a surrender to Muslims (trust me folks, Axlrose will find a way to link the two!). Was it when the the ethnic minorities in Britain snuck past the 8% mark, plunging the UK into sectarian warfare, its citizens running to the nuclear fall out shelters?
The brilliance of Axlrose’s theory is that it seems to not be intruded upon by reality at any stage. The presence of the UK as the sold US ally still committing troops on the frontlines in Iraq and Afghanistan is an optical illusion.
We may have bought the trident delivery system from you but believe me we could quite easily have developed an alternative
You DO realise that it was BRITAIN WHO GAVE AMERICA access to its nuclear technology FOR NOTHING in 1940, when America was neutral?...
You slso realise that Britain had its own nuclear weaponry from 1945-1962, when we adopted the Polaris system purely on cost, as the then British weapons systems were costing too much in the then govt’s eyes...
You NEVER have answered my question of why you hate Britain so much. My guess is an Irish-American chip on the shoulder...
Am I wrong?.
Britain DID and COULD have had an independent nuclear deterrent,but THEMSELVES chose to take the cheaper option of co-operation with America.
As a recent brilliant Channel 4(UK) documentary has shown,the British in the 1950’s and early 60’s,despite less funds than the USA or the USSR,built some quite brilliant and revolutionary aircraft,rockets and nuclear launchers.
Britain in fact in those years(1950-1962) built products equal to and in fact SUPERIOR in many ways to even the American or Russian technology...
BUT guess who but the politicians,both Labour and Conservative,decided on several occasions that solo projects were too expensive and we settled for co-operation with America.
Many British ideas in fact then found a home in America and helped boost Anglo-American technology.
Britian DID match America and Russia in the Cold War.
And then the politicians threw it away......idiots,bloody idiots......
British Cold War Superweapons:
British Cold War Superweapons:
These pro-immigration officials in Europe must be getting paid off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.