You can tell the man who boozes,by the company he chooses ...
and the pig got up and slowly walked away.
Posted on 09/13/2007 10:32:56 AM PDT by jdm
You can tell the man who boozes,
by the company he chooses ...
and the pig got up and slowly walked away.
The poem by Clarke Van Ness warns people that they will be judged by the actions of those with whom they choose to associate -- and even a pig has enough sense to walk away from disaster. Hillary Clinton has a big problem with her associates, and it's self-inflicted. Lost in the Norman Hsu shuffle, the news that Hillary has asked former Clinton national-security adviser Sandy Berger to join her campaign should cause even more questions about her judgment and her ethics:
The more experienced Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, has relied largely on her husband and a triumvirate of senior officials from his presidency—former secretary of state Madeleine Albright, former U.N. ambassador Richard Holbrooke and former national-security adviser Sandy Berger (who tries to keep a low profile after pleading guilty in 2005 to misdemeanor charges of taking classified material without authorization).
Berger didn't just commit some technical violation, either. He went to the National Archives on behalf of Bill Clinton as part of the investigation of the 9/11 attacks. While there, he deliberately hid highly classified material in his socks to avoid detection and dropped them under a trailer on a break. Later, he retrieved the material and took it home, and wound up destroying the evidence while his nation tried to find as much material on Clinton-era counterterrorism efforts in order to better protect ourselves in the future.
Given that despicable behavior, what political candidates would ever associate themselves with Berger again? Even John Kerry dumped Berger when the crime came to light. He knew better than to associate himself with someone who obstructed an investigation into the worst attack on American soil -- a man who may have covered up actions which would have proven embarrassing to Bill Clinton, and a major stumbling block to the presidential aspirations of his wife.
We now have two examples of Hillary Clinton associating herself with people of low character and criminal behavior. Unlike the pig in the song, Hillary not only has not removed herself from the gutter, she seems to be encouraging the ethically challenged to join her there. How many more of these characters will we discover in the Hillary campaign? How many more will the Democrats need to see before ending the sleaze train?
Richard Miniter has more personal recollections of Berger's efforts to keep the Clinton errors quiet. He also ends with a very pertinent question:
My informed sources suggest that what Berger destroyed were copies of the Millennium After-Action Review, a binder-sized report prepared by Richard Clarke in 2000—a year and half before the 9-11 attacks. The review made a series of recommendations for a tougher stance against bin Laden and terrorism. There are 13 or more copies of this report. But only one contains hand-written notes by President Bill Clinton. Apparently, in the margin beside the recommendations, Bill Clinton wrote NO, NO, NO next to many of the tougher policy proposals. ...
Did she bring him aboard to reward him for his criminal destruction of classified material? Or did she sign him up because of his stellar record in fighting bin Laden in the late 1990s?
To ensure his silence.
Truly disgusting. They have no shame.
Great title.
If she wins(God forbid) her Cabinet and all appointments will a who’s who of Clinton I idiots
The title of this thread has me in stitches!!
I expect nothing less from Hillary.
This is gonna make a great campaign ad....
Another Bush Administration failure: not putting Sandy Burglar behind bars for the rest of his life.
LOL
Doesn’t it stink!
Will the Burglar make him “disappear” too? Aren’t her union goons more up to that type of task?
Outstanding title!
Do the Clintons associate with ANY upstanding folks?
Or are they all pieces of crap like Berger?
If Hillary! wins, that means Captain Stockstuffer will be granted another security clearance. Just what this country needs. / sarc.
That wasn’t a failure at all. Anyone who has any doubts about the one-party rule in this country should remember that Berger’s plea deal included a stipulation that he’d lose his national security clearance for a period of time that just so happened to expire in 2008.
And because they have some more dirty work for him to do.
Hsus And Socks, Blue dresses, Pants suits and Goodwill underwear. Soon they’ll have a whole new closet full of skeletons...........
Don’t mean to diminish the criminality of what Sandy Burglar did, but there are much more serious criminal acts of the Clintons and associates (including violent ones) to which the Bush Administration has turned a blind eye. You are right, it has been a major failure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.