Skip to comments.
Talking to al Qaeda? Don't rule it out, some say (MEGAHURL!)
Reuters via Yahoo ^
| Thu Sep 13
| Mark Trevelyan, Security Correspondent (lol)
Posted on 09/13/2007 12:32:06 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Not sure what to say except...NO!
To: PreciousLiberty
In retrospect, I suppose we should have talked with Hitler instead of fighting.
2
posted on
09/13/2007 12:33:47 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
To: PreciousLiberty
Give me liberty and give them death!
3
posted on
09/13/2007 12:33:49 PM PDT
by
PeterFinn
(Do not wish ill for your enemies, plan it.)
To: PreciousLiberty
Dear "some",
Go right ahead & do your "talking." Get back to us if you survive a beheading, you dumba$$ dhimmis.
4
posted on
09/13/2007 12:34:41 PM PDT
by
kromike
To: PreciousLiberty
Why in the hell do they keep writing this crap? I guess these clowns haven’t figured out how dumb they sound.
5
posted on
09/13/2007 12:34:44 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: PreciousLiberty
history shows militant movements are best neutralized by negotiation, not warYeah, worked great with Hitler. Tojo too. (Maybe they weren't "militant" enough). Frickin' morons.
To: PreciousLiberty
We’re already talking to al Qaeda. And the libs don’t like it because it’s unpleasant for the jihadis. In their mind, it’s not just a matter of talking to them. It’s a matter of giving respect to them.
7
posted on
09/13/2007 12:35:25 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: PreciousLiberty
I say yes, talk to Al Qaeda, put them under military trial, and execute them all for committing horrible war crimes.
Or are they visualizing world appeasement again?
8
posted on
09/13/2007 12:35:45 PM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: All
Its vision -- to create a global Muslim caliphate and convert even the United States to Islam, as its leader Osama bin Laden urged in a video last week -- is a dream that is not confined within national boundaries and leaves no room for compromise, or even realistic discussion. ummm, yep, definately room for diplomacy with these people /sarc
To: PreciousLiberty
You just can’t make this cr@p up. I swear... these liberal morons would keep trying to talk to these monsters as they were sawing their heads off.
10
posted on
09/13/2007 12:36:04 PM PDT
by
farlander
(Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
To: tobyhill
They forgot that Hitler betrayed their beloved Joe Stalin.
11
posted on
09/13/2007 12:36:34 PM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: PreciousLiberty
But proponents say al Qaeda has established itself as a de facto power, whether the West likes it or not, and history shows militant movements are best neutralized by negotiation, not war. Wrong...the Mongols dealt very successfully with the Order of Assassins by killing them in very creative ways.
To: PreciousLiberty
Jan Egeland, a Norwegian who helped broker secret talks between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation in the 1990sAh yes, the famous "Oslo Accords." They worked almost as well as Munich did.
To: PreciousLiberty
I propose that the Democratic Congressional leadership take the reigns and begin negotiations with the terrorists. The Dems can begin by offering to submit ... Oh wait ... they have already started. Scratch That.
14
posted on
09/13/2007 12:38:57 PM PDT
by
TexGuy
To: Red in Blue PA
> In retrospect, I suppose we should have
> talked with Hitler instead of fighting.
Uh, we did, and got “Peace in our time”.
Whenever some vacant skull proposes this,
merely ask them:
“How does one negotiate agreements with
people who don’t keep agreements?”
15
posted on
09/13/2007 12:39:24 PM PDT
by
Boundless
(Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
To: PreciousLiberty
history shows militant movements are best neutralized by negotiation, not war.Cutting off their goolies is also good.
To: PreciousLiberty
There are some rational players in al Qaeda
That immediately disqualifies anyone from talking intelligently on the subject. There really are some that seek our downfall and Dhimmi-tude.
17
posted on
09/13/2007 12:40:47 PM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(90 Guns per 100 Americans...You will never take us.)
To: All
history shows militant movements are best neutralized by negotiation, not war Unless, of course, it's the Minutemen, the Branch Davidians, Randy Weaver, ot etc. - it's shoot first and suppress questions later when it's alleged American militants we're talking about.
Proven threats like Osama get more tolerance from these %#@%$#! than Americans do.
18
posted on
09/13/2007 12:41:04 PM PDT
by
PeterFinn
(Do not wish ill for your enemies, plan it.)
To: hinckley buzzard
Ah yes, the famous "Oslo Accords." They worked almost as well as Munich did. If you're referring to Munich 1972, then yes, you're right. [/s]
19
posted on
09/13/2007 12:43:14 PM PDT
by
PeterFinn
(Do not wish ill for your enemies, plan it.)
To: kromike
I nominate Hillary as Ambassador to Al Qaeda!
20
posted on
09/13/2007 12:43:33 PM PDT
by
Califreak
(Go Hunter!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson