[samm1148]

I was reading what Ramius posted above: He is right. But I guess as a commonsensnik my point is that there seem to be so many variables in weather and climate that attempts at long range predictions seem fantastical.

Also I think that something becomes science fact when it is consistently provable; like the boiling point of water. The short range predictions these global warming nuts are making have so far panned out wrong: Cloud formations they predicted haven’t shown. The dire prediction of tropical storms have failed to materialize now two years in a row and ice is increasing in the interior of Antarctica.

But what do I know? I’m just a dumb old commonsensnik.

[TenthAmendmentChampion]

Were you aware that none of the climate modeling computer programs take clouds into account? Because it’s too hard to model and the mechanism of creating clouds is poorly understood. Not one model out there takes clouds into account.