Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson Appears to Have No Opinion on Terri Schiavo Euthanasia Case
Lifenews ^ | 9/14/07 | Steve Ertelt

Posted on 09/14/2007 10:26:10 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: newzjunkey
Never mind the facts, forget the law, they have feeeeelings on this very critical national issue about the indisputably very dead Terri Schiavo!

There is not a convicted criminal in this nation that would have been KILLED in this manner. Terri Schiavo was NO criminal. What is now set by this precedent is if there is no living will any person who has legal control of another can give and get testimony without evidence, claiming, said controlled person would not want to live that way.

61 posted on 09/15/2007 1:58:46 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He doesn’t have the balls to have an opinion on TERRI,Starve or no starve.


62 posted on 09/15/2007 2:00:40 AM PDT by fatima (Baby alert,Baby Ava arrived 6-29-07 at 3 PM-she is 10 pounds:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: fatima

You need psychological help. I’m not insulting you, just telling you to seek treatment.


63 posted on 09/15/2007 2:07:48 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (https://www.fred08.com/contribute.aspx?RefererID=c637caaa-315c-4b4c-9967-08d864cd0791)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have no opinion on that.To starve or not to starve-that is the question.
64 posted on 09/15/2007 2:13:09 AM PDT by fatima (Baby alert,Baby Ava arrived 6-29-07 at 3 PM-she is 10 pounds:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: pissant

OMG, if you idiots let this moronic gift to Liberals everywhere [see wedge issue that divides conservatives] polute the water where Fred Thompson is deserved, you friggin deserve Hillary.

Bunch of dummies!!


65 posted on 09/15/2007 2:13:39 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Haha, I'm tired.

Parting shit...

FRED THOMPSON APPEARS TO HAVE NO OPINION ON THE WHEREABOUTS OF AL CAPONE'S VAULT

66 posted on 09/15/2007 2:17:01 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Hellloho.They just want to so let them go.Will they and their candidate grow up-I doubt it.I am looking at who he sent in here.
67 posted on 09/15/2007 2:20:08 AM PDT by fatima (Baby alert,Baby Ava arrived 6-29-07 at 3 PM-she is 10 pounds:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: fatima

Wow! I had to read each of your posts on this thread at least twice before I could understand what you were trying to say (an observation shared by others on this thread, I see).

Just thought you might like to know. Fragmented sentences, one word phrases, and choppy/abrupt punctuation don’t make for easy reading.


68 posted on 09/15/2007 3:02:40 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
You know they must be running out of material pretty soon, someone somewhere is writing the puppy story right now.

LOL. Probably so. They already did the "Mitt hates puppies" story.

69 posted on 09/15/2007 9:24:02 AM PDT by Hugin (Mecca delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fatima

I don’t give a rat’s ass whether someone goes to church regularly. Ronald Reagan was not a big church goer. Bill Clinton was. I don’t think a need to be a part of a congregation is a true indicator of the sincerity of ones beliefs.


70 posted on 09/15/2007 9:39:03 AM PDT by Hugin (Mecca delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It was about a fight between her family and her husband, with every one and their brother taking sides. The politicians got involved for political gain, not for her. I hope this dosen’t become the focus of FR again, I would hate to stop coming to FR for months again.


71 posted on 09/15/2007 1:45:50 PM PDT by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This is very sad. I think I can see now why Fred stayed out of the race for so long because that allowed everyone to assume that he agreed with them. Over the past week, I have become more convinced then ever that Fred simply is not a social conservative. He is more of a libertarian conservative and the social conservatives who support him are going to be sorely dissapointed in the end.


72 posted on 09/15/2007 3:04:18 PM PDT by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Maybe we would find out if the mighty FT would only show up at a debate.


73 posted on 09/15/2007 3:14:32 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Al Gore didn't invent the Internet, but he did make up Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GregH
I can’t wait to see FT in a debate with the other candidates.

But not to worry — as one person who is obviously a Fredhead posted on a site regarding FT opposing an amendment to ban gay marriage:

“Daniel writes: GO FRED! Who cares what Fred believes?

He’s the great conservative hope.

He’s hound-dog mean. He’s got southern character and big-city northeast smarts. He’s been a tough DA in New York City. We’ve all seen how he runs that office. Just watch when he gets his hands on the terrorists.”

With all due respect to my friends on FR, I suspect there are a lot of folks out there that are confusing reality with fantasy.

Or was Fred Thompson really a DA in New York City?

I don't know -- I've never watched Law & Order.

Anyway, he's such a hero, he can be forgiven anything!!

74 posted on 09/15/2007 3:31:22 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Al Gore didn't invent the Internet, but he did make up Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The facts: Fred says now: "I know NOTHING!"

Fred's obviously equally ignorant and oblivious (to be charitable) defenders say there's no reason Fred should have known about the case.

You decide.


75 posted on 09/15/2007 3:35:34 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lolhelp

And in that same vein of reasoning, Dred Scott was a fight by a property owner to get his (non-human) property back, where he was opposed by many politicians for political gain.


76 posted on 09/15/2007 3:38:51 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bethtopaz

Beth, Fred announced on the 6th of September, right after Labor Day. Traditionally candidates do just that, wait until after Labor Day. Why should we have an eighteen month Presidential Campaign? Nobody pays much attention until about 4 to 6 weeks before the primary. Hardly anyone pays any attention until after Labor Day for the general election either. Thompson was right to wait. The media has everyone thinking Thompson can’t win now. That’s silly.

Thompson is fine. We’ve just bought the idiotic pronouncements by the MSM, that’s all.


77 posted on 09/15/2007 4:09:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Isn’t he special?

I’m sorry, but if Fred Thompson was a qualified candidate I would give him serious consideration.

He just does NOT have the resume to qualify for POTUS, and it doesn’t seem that he has the desire to do the work that is required to get the job either.

I know all you Fredheads just love him and think he’s the savior of the GOP, but I just don’t see it.

Not at all.

He sure can throw out those one-liners, though.

Not much substance, but a lot of Southern charm.

78 posted on 09/15/2007 5:13:12 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Al Gore didn't invent the Internet, but he did make up Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: bethtopaz

Beth, either federalism is addressed soon, or the nation we love will be gone. It will turn into what we have fought for centuries to avoid taking us over by force.

You may not like Fred Thompson, and that’s okay. If another person pops up that wants to take federalism on, I’ll consider them.

I still haven’t made up my mind who I’m going to vote for, perhaps you have. I would submit that Thompson has exhibited in several weeks what others haven’t bothered to in months.

You take care.


79 posted on 09/15/2007 10:47:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

What would Dr. Ron Paul say about the federal government taking jurisdiction in this particular state case?

Are principles involved? Life or death decisions?


80 posted on 09/17/2007 6:43:59 AM PDT by ChuteTheMall (Tagline: If you're reading this, I'm influencing your mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson