Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hsu Linked to Past Clinton Scandal Donor
Cybercast News Service ^ | September 14, 2007 | Fred Lucas

Posted on 09/15/2007 12:59:07 AM PDT by CutePuppy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: CutePuppy

Anyone who thinks the Communist Chinese wouldn’t blackmail Hillary is naive.


41 posted on 09/18/2007 8:26:18 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Would it be too early to assert that the reasons for setting up and using the names of these “companies” and those similar to them were not to do a legitimate business, but to hold himself up in political circles as a successful businessman, and establish business bank accounts to be ready as potential channels for laundering money to campaigns through “investments” and “loans” to these businesses?

Setting up business names with very little activity is not proof of illegal intent. He may have intended to do legal business but failed to generate any business activity. If you however combine the other relevant facts: Claiming he had a business called 'Components Ltd' before he actually filed 'Next Components, Inc' in New York demonstrates criminal intent; Incorrect Spelling (Componets Ltd) and Claiming Business Names that never existed (Because) on a Political Donation demonstrates intent to deceive; etc. etc. What we have evidence of is intent to deceive. It will be up to the feds to determine criminality. Obviously using post dated checks as part of a negotiated business exchange which later turned out to bad due to insufficient funds is a crime. Is he was fronting a lot of unregistered company names he would have had problems setting up a lot of bank accounts. He probably had a corporate account for the Next Components Ltd. May have done some DBA names for the fake or front companies. He would have had some problems though. My guess is he either worked with a lot of cash or he had a colluding bank or bank insider that helped him cash checks made out to fake names.

Intent to deceive, yes.
Criminality, to be determined by feds and banks.
Democrats being surprised by all this, either they are easily fooled, they are lieing or they are easily fooled liars.

I think it is a safe bet to state what you want to state. To state what is obvious and what history has taught us about the Crintons.

42 posted on 09/18/2007 9:39:53 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]





MONEY
HONEY

HSU'S     GOT

43 posted on 09/18/2007 9:44:34 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
Criminality, to be determined by feds and banks.

Well, if we can help a little... 8->

44 posted on 09/20/2007 1:09:00 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

bttt


45 posted on 12/30/2007 11:59:42 PM PST by Mr Apple ( "VIDEO CHINAGATE" http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2970981220206109356)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson