Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts
It was more about Israel than oil, IMO. Saddam was funding Palestinian homicide bombers. He was an obstacle to peace.

_________________________________________

Not at all. It was about giving us a land presence in the region that we control so that we would not need to beg permission from the Saudis or the Tutks next time we need to exert power. Why this region instead of Central Africa or Peru or Thailand? Oil, oil for the next three generations.

While we 'support' Israel much of our concern gor them isdue to their location as a powerful ally. If Israel were situated next to Morocco we would not be so vehement in our support.

118 posted on 09/16/2007 7:49:13 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911

That’s very true. Another one of the reasons was to have somewhere to put our troops so we could withdraw from Saudi Arabia.


120 posted on 09/16/2007 12:05:34 PM PDT by B Knotts (Tancredo '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson