Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Home mortgage crisis affecting renters, too
Knox News ^ | September 15, 2007 | David Crary, Rachel Konrad

Posted on 09/15/2007 5:55:45 PM PDT by Lorianne

STAMFORD, Conn. — This isn’t how Simon and Jennifer Morris envisioned married life — sharing a charity-subsidized suite with four other hard-up families, abiding by a curfew and other rules that make them feel they are back in high school.

But for a working-class couple with two small children, trying to stick it out in their pricey hometown, housing options are few.

They abandoned their previous one-bedroom apartment when the rent rose from $1,200 to $1,425. Public housing has long waiting lists, so they moved into a shelter for dislocated families in a converted YMCA. The goal: Save enough money to move south and buy a home where costs are lower.

Around them, southwestern Connecticut’s Fairfield County is booming, due partly to an influx of investment banks. New housing projects routinely cater to the affluent.

“But everybody forgets the poor guy — the one who pumps your gas, who builds your hotel, who bags your groceries,” said Simon Morris, a 35-year-old carpenter. “The cost of living is driving us out.”

On both coasts of the United States and many cities in between, hundreds of thousands of renters face comparable plights. The home mortgage crisis has received far more notice, but experts say the ranks of renters with dire housing problems are growing faster than the ranks of defaulting homeowners.

The Center for Housing Policy reports that the number of working-family renters paying more than half their income for housing has soared from 1 million to 2.1 million since 1997. Overall, advocacy groups say there are 9 million low-income renter households and only 6.2 million units they can reasonably afford.

“These people spend huge portions of their income on their housing,” said Sheila Crowley, president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition. “They don’t do things that we all would like to do — save money to buy a house, or for college or retirement. It’s a very day-to-day existence.”

In the Stamford area, a breadwinner needs to earn more than $30 an hour to afford the rent of a typical two-bedroom apartment, the highest figure in the nation. San Francisco ranks a close second — placing immense burdens on residents such as schoolteacher Meagan Devine and retiree Jose Morales.

Devine, 30, lives with her sister, who is eight months pregnant, and brother-in-law in a one-bedroom apartment in San Francisco’s Sunset district. She sleeps on the couch and spends weekends at her parents’ house in a distant suburb, where she keeps her clothes and books.

In October, she’ll begin house-sitting for family friends in Berkeley who will be on sabbatical until Jan. 1. After that? She isn’t sure.

Devine isn’t an itinerant hippie or recent college graduate trying to map a career path. She’s a professional with a master’s degree in math and likely could command a six-figure salary at a Silicon Valley engineering firm.

But since college, she has yearned to be a teacher. After getting her master’s degree, she taught the children of crop pickers.

Since 2002, she’s been a math instructor at Balboa High School, once a hardscrabble school on the city’s south side. Test scores and morale are on the rise, and Devine feels she’s making a big difference by teaching pre-calculus and algebra to the diverse student body.

“I don’t ever want to leave Balboa — I’d love to retire from here,” Devine said as she stacked papers following the afternoon bell. “The only problem is I can’t afford to live here on a teacher’s salary.”

After taxes and a $350 deposit into a retirement fund, she takes home about $2,500 per month. One-bedroom apartments in desirable neighborhoods — near friends and public transit — start around $2,000 per month. Studios start around $1,500.

Devine said she’ll likely settle for roommates — a fate she didn’t envision for herself after college, and a far cry from her dream of home ownership.

Technically, she could afford her own modest apartment — but she wants to heed the standard advice and not spend more than a third of her income on housing. That’s not easy; experts say nearly a quarter of San Francisco renters spend more than 50 percent of their household earnings on rent, and the market has grown tighter as the mortgage crisis deters some young adults from home-buying.

Devine rarely goes out to eat or buys new clothes but despite a frugal lifestyle has been unable to whittle down $3,000 in credit card debt.

“You have to make big sacrifices — not just whether to buy a house or not,” said Devine. “I want to have kids — but what would I do with them? I can’t even afford my own place.”

Devine works at least 50 hours a week, including several hours each weekend grading quizzes. Some of her colleagues moonlight as waitresses, bartenders and weekend nannies.

One option would be moving to a suburban school district, where pay scales range up to $10,000 higher than in San Francisco. A public school teacher in the city starts at $43,000.

Losing teachers like Devine should be a top concern for residents, said Matthew Hardy of the United Educators San Francisco. Teachers who stay have to be either “crazy or dedicated,” he said.

Jose Morales, now 78, moved into a modest Victorian house in San Francisco’s working-class Mission District in 1965, shortly after emigrating from Peru. The rent was $80 a month, and he used leftover earnings to travel, buy nice clothes and eat well.

The rent is now $864 — a bargain by local standards but an unmanageable fortune for Morales. A former tennis instructor, he hurt his back last year and now relies entirely on a Social Security payment of $900 per month.

After paying the rent, he has $36 a month for expenses, including food and medications. He eats at city-sponsored senior centers, which charge $1.50 per meal, buys cut-rate produce from local bodegas and takes freebies from friends.

He never travels. He doesn’t own a television or radio. Among his few new clothes are tennis sweatshirts that pro shops sell him at a discount.

“I’m skin and bones — it’s a miracle I’m still here,” said Morales, who’s lost 20 pounds since last year and developed osteoporosis.

Stooped but sinewy, with wavy white hair and vintage Wilson sneakers, Morales has received numerous eviction notices from a landlord hoping to convert the two-unit flat into a luxury house. Morales refuses to leave; a court showdown is imminent.

“If more people don’t try to fight for their rights, then only rich people would live in this city,” he says.

Morales’ apartment is ramshackle. Doorframes lean at improbable angles. Paint peels from walls, and a gaping crack splits the kitchen ceiling.

But the beautifully restored Victorian next door has golden cornices and fresh paint, and other nearby homes are getting high-end renovations. The neighborhood is rife with homeless people and illegal immigrants, but white-collar workers are moving in to commute to lucrative jobs in Silicon Valley or downtown.

Morales knows he might live better in Peru, where relatives could help and the cost of living is a fraction of California’s. But that would end his quest for American citizenship.

“I came here because the U.S. was a great country,” Morales said. “But housing has become a big injustice. ... The story of my apartment is the story of my block and the story of my city and the story of all of California and the United States. You have to fight for it, and that’s what I will do — all the way to the end.”

Back in Stamford, Simon and Jennifer Morris have seen the city’s economic boom firsthand but, like many working-class families, haven’t shared its fruits.

Simon Morris has irregular earnings as a carpenter; he can make $1,000 in a good week but often has no work at all. Jennifer Morris, 27, worked in the past at local pet stores but took time off this year following the birth of Layla, who’s now 7 months old. Their other child, Ethan, is 3.

Since February, they’ve been living in a “family emergency” shelter on the edge of downtown, part of a multipurpose social-service center run by St. Luke’s LifeWorks.

They have two bedrooms of their own but share bathrooms and a combination kitchen-common room with four other families in a setup resembling a college dorm. There’s an 11 p.m. curfew on weeknights, no drinking or smoking in the unit and a rotation of chores for each family.

“After living on your own, where you can come and go, you can feel a little claustrophobic,” Jennifer Morris said. “You’ve got to coexist with everyone. Sometimes I feel like I’m back in high school.”

For Simon Morris, the biggest downside is lack of privacy.

“There’s good days and bad days,” he said. “People notice when I’m grumpy, and sometimes I just want to be left alone.”

But overall, the Morrises are grateful. They can stay up to two years at the shelter, far longer than at many similar facilities, and they expect to be able to save money — for the first time in their married life — due to a cost-sharing formula that leaves them paying St. Luke’s about $250 a month.

If the savings materialize, they plan to head south, seeking a community where homes are within reach of a family like theirs.

“Stamford forgot about the poor people,” said Simon Morris, who, like his wife, grew up here. “All these new apartments are great for the city, but some of the one-bedrooms are $3,000 a month. ... It’s a businessman’s town now.”

The executive director of St. Luke’s LifeWorks, the Rev. Dick Schuster, says Stamford and boomtowns like it should tackle the housing crisis out of self-interest.

“The people who are working in your restaurants, your fire and police departments, are all of a sudden finding they can no longer afford to live in the community where they work,” he said. “And those who do choose to live in the community become the true working poor, hanging on by their thumbs.”

David Crary reported from Stamford and Rachel Konrad from San Francisco.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: housing; landuse; mortgage; rentals; taxes; zoning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2007 5:55:48 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

You pay your money and make your choices.


2 posted on 09/15/2007 6:01:39 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

This is an incredibly stupid story about people who CHOOSE to live the way they do - no one is forcing them to do anything other than what they want to do!


3 posted on 09/15/2007 6:05:01 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
I couldn't afford to live in San Francisco. A good home there is beyond my reach and an apartment could be stretching it. The housing crisis affects working class and middle class folks. How many can afford to buy a $1 million home in the City By the Bay? So these people are being driven out out by the high cost of housing.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 09/15/2007 6:05:40 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
Does it enter your head at all people still try to live there and realize the American Dream? Not too long ago, the middle class could afford to buy a nice home for a decent price on one or maybe two salaries. My Dad and Mom bought our first home in the mid 70s in California in a desirable neighborhood for $15,000. That was before the real estate market zoomed into the stratosphere.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 09/15/2007 6:08:59 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yep. I paid $50,000 for my three bedroom ranch home on 2 acres of land. In RURAL GEORGIA. That’s my choice. I could live on the northside of Atlanta and pay $200,000 for a 2 bedroom condo. Or $200,000 for the same size home (albeit ‘nicer’ neighborhood) with a postage stamp amount of land to go with it. But I chose substance for my money and instead pay the dollars to commute. I MOVED from the ‘big city’. Darn, what a concept!


6 posted on 09/15/2007 6:11:44 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

My neighbors have been leasing a home and faithfully paying the $2,800 per month payments. They’ve been there over a year and just renewed their lease. Unknown to them, however, is that the owners have been pocketing the lease payments and not paying the mortgage and are now in foreclosure. What a bummer.


7 posted on 09/15/2007 6:11:49 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Solution: MOVE!

This is just a hit piece to create guilt. The folks featured in the article want to live in an area that is beyond their means...

8 posted on 09/15/2007 6:14:26 PM PDT by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John123
I moved out of California. The real estate market there is like its for millionaires with wads of disposable income. Insane hardly begins to describe the California housing situation.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

9 posted on 09/15/2007 6:16:12 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Landlords are jumping, most all are raising their rents.


10 posted on 09/15/2007 6:16:23 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

We live in a free market society. We know lots of people who have left CA and found the same or lower pay elsewhere, but much lower housing costs, better schools and lower taxes. There is no way govt can FIX this problem.
Once the business’s and schools no longer can find lower level employees..pay will have to rise. Unless you can be replaced by illegals living 29 to a bedroom.


11 posted on 09/15/2007 6:16:46 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Does it enter your head at all people still try to live there and realize the American Dream?

Yes it does, goldstategop, but people also have to face reality - reality that real estate prices are not the same as they were when we were kids, and neither are income levels either. You know as well as I do that things are going to change, and reading articles like these that focus on all the hardships people face ... can't these people accept the limitations their own choices have made them? Government should not help them ... sorry for my rant.

12 posted on 09/15/2007 6:17:44 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
They abandoned their previous one-bedroom apartment when the rent rose from $1,200 to $1,425. Public housing has long waiting lists, so they moved into a shelter for dislocated families in a converted YMCA.

Huh ? you can afford 1200 per month rent but not 1425 so you look for public housing then settle for YMCA ? yeah..that's the ticket
13 posted on 09/15/2007 6:20:58 PM PDT by stylin19a (Go Bears !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
You'd be right we should all live within our means. Most of us seek to do that. Some people still want more than they can afford - its human nature. I decided California was no longer the place for me to live. Other people well - they look at it differently and its their choice.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

14 posted on 09/15/2007 6:21:20 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

talk about title vs. article disconnect...


15 posted on 09/15/2007 6:23:19 PM PDT by stylin19a (Go Bears !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Me too. So what is with your Freep Name?


16 posted on 09/15/2007 6:23:29 PM PDT by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
The real problem is restrictions in California that limit the supply of land and regulate the type of housing that can be built. Imposed by government which drives up costs and makes housing expensive.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

17 posted on 09/15/2007 6:23:30 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John123
I can't change my screen name. I'd love to but I can't do it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

18 posted on 09/15/2007 6:24:24 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

that’s great...but this particular couple lived in CT.
And additional 225 bucks a month takes you out of an apartment and into the YMCA ?

something is really missing in this story.


19 posted on 09/15/2007 6:25:59 PM PDT by stylin19a (Go Bears !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
“You have to make big sacrifices — not just whether to buy a house or not,” said Devine. “I want to have kids — but what would I do with them? I can’t even afford my own place.”

Apparently, she hasn't figured out that maybe getting MARRIED before having the kids would help?

Devine works at least 50 hours a week, including several hours each weekend grading quizzes. Some of her colleagues moonlight as waitresses, bartenders and weekend nannies.

Cry me a river, honey! I was a teacher for 19 years, worked a second job, and went to grad school 3 nights a week for several years. Then I went into high-tech, and finally managed to buy a house when I was 45 years old. This chick needs to quit whining.

20 posted on 09/15/2007 6:26:07 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson