Wake up pissant. Your tired old establishment hacks are the very reason this country is going down the crapper. Big government, tax and spend nannies on the left, and big government, tax and spend just a little bit less nannies on the right. Absolutely no progress on ending Social Security or the IRS, we’re still in the United Nations, education is in shambles, and we continue to fight wars that are dangerous to our national security while our own nation’s borders remain completely wide open.
Duncan Hunter is not going to energize the base, he is not going to defeat Hillary Clinton, and the Ron Paul Revolution continues to convert people to conservatism faster and quicker than any single individual since Ronald Reagan.
Whine and moan all you want, but at the end of the day, you’re wrong, we’re right, our numbers are growing and the good news for everyone is that a whole generation of educated young people are realizing that it’s the establishment party hacks who ruined the Republican party and gave the conservative movement a black eye. You people had your chance and you screwed it up. Our time is now. We’re moving forward with the American Experiment in Liberty, and it starts with the GOP. We take back our party and then we take back our country.
yup, that 1% mark is rollong to a whopping 1.1%. It's a tidal wave!!!
Do you really believe the the stuff you post?
BTW...your old pall Ron is one of those old establishment hacks.
You can’t possibly be as ignorant as your post indicates. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.
I saw a video where Ron Paul was discussing 9-11 with ‘Scholars for 9-11 truth’. Are these the educated young people to which you make reference? The representative for ‘Scholars 4 troof’ was discussing the possibility of an investigation into 9-11 with Paul.
Paul equivocated and wouldn’t come out and say he believed 9-11 was pulled off by our government. Yet, finally, Paul managed to out-loon the loons and took nuttiness to a ho nuvver level. Paul stated that most investigations into conspiracies were cover ups anyway, but assured the young man he would look into it. Paul also told the young man that he would get with Kucinich and see if they could work together and get an investigation rolling. Paul seemed to think telling this troofer he had worked with Kucinich before would give him more credibility with this youth.
Surely, this is enough, for you to question this mans candidacy, if not his sanity? What more do you need to know?
Also: 1) Why does Paul never correct those who introduce him as a Vietnam veteran?
2) Paul is as sincere about his history of securing our borders as most of the rest of the candidates. Why does he continue to pretend he has credibility on immigration when his past tells a different story?
I think you get the picture. I could go on but there are FRed THreads that need me.