Posted on 09/17/2007 8:07:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
WASHINGTON -- Meeting reporters at breakfast last week, Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson set as his tax priority a "patch" to slow the runaway Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The former investment banker acted as though he were oblivious to plans by Rep. Charles Rangel, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, to turn the need for such a temporary tax fix into the most radical left-wing tax revision in half a century.
When one questioner asked whether Paulson contemplated recommending a presidential veto of AMT legislation, he indicated astonishment at the very idea. His only stated concern was that Congress this year had not patched the AMT, originally intended to catch tax-evading millionaires, to prevent it from wreaking havoc on middle-income Americans. Paulson uttered not a word about what Rangel is up to.
Finally achieving his coveted chairman's role after years of waiting, Rangel wants to make history. His staff is hard at work on an audacious plan that over the next decade would redistribute up to a trillion dollars in American income through the tax system. Even if this package gets through the House, it likely would be filibustered to death in the Senate, with a veto by President George W. Bush as the last resort. But Rangel may really be aiming at 2009, envisioning then a Democratic president and a filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the Senate.
Unlike the Republican Ways and Means chairmen who preceded him over the previous 12 years, Rangel has a comprehensive tax strategy and a tactical game plan. His wedge is the AMT, the latest and most egregious lunacy imposed on the American taxpayer. Its present form would raise $1.4 trillion in revenue over the next decade, through taxation of 23 million additional families this year alone. Congress regularly prevents this calamity by enacting a patch that limits AMT coverage to 4 million upper-bracket families.
But Rangel has refused to pass a patch, and he has not hidden what he has in mind. When Congress returned from its summer break, Ways and Means summoned the usual lineup of tax redistributionists for a Sept. 6 hearing on "fair and equitable tax policy for America's working families." Jason Furman, director of the Brookings Institution's Hamilton Project, deplored "the increase in inequality" caused by the Bush tax cuts, which he said "have exacerbated after-tax income disparities."
On the day after the hearings, Rangel called in reporters to tell them an AMT "one-year patch is not on the radar screen." Advocating total repeal of AMT, he promised to pay for $800 billion in lost revenue over the next 10 years with "the mother of all reforms."
Rangel talked about closing "loopholes," but the real money would come from drastically increasing the number of Americans paying the top 36 percent income tax rate and applying that rate to present capital gains taxpayers. Rangel also is considering the old millionaires' tax, but applying it to much more than millionaires: a surtax on household incomes over $200,000. All this would reverse the tide of across-the-board tax reduction begun by John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson and renewed by Ronald Reagan.
While Rangel appears to be preparing for big-time tax increases in 2009, he is giving it a try for 2007. Something surely will be done to blunt AMT this year, and Rangel is holding it hostage with ransom to be paid by left-wing tax revision. Even if it will not enable passage of the "mother of all reforms," it could force passage of more limited redistribution this autumn.
In his meeting with reporters last week, Paulson claimed to be puzzled that Congress had not yet passed an AMT patch this year. But he is not nearly so clueless. He understands Rangel's game and takes it seriously. Paulson views a tax increase as the worst medicine for today's economy.
Indeed, Paulson is alarmed that the U.S. advantage in tax policy is gone, with corporate taxes here now higher than those of foreign competitors. However, cutting corporate taxes, no matter how desirable for the sake of American prosperity, is no part of Charlie Rangel's desire to make history.
This plan would make the economy tank. Raising the capital gains tax rate is just plain stupid, but leftist Democraps never learn.
Indeed they don’t, but they want everyone to make the same mistakes they made
After the bravado of “teach them a lesson”, we now get whining and sniveling.
Yep, that’s our government. Everything for them; nothing for us.
You are so correct - I’ve read dozens of posts over the last week that since Republicans didn’t stay true to small gov’t principles they deserved to lose. I’ve continually asked the question “And Democrats deserve to win” ?
The most common answer was an avoidance of the fact that Democrats will do worse things than RINO Republicans.
It’s not who you vote for, its who you elect.
Democrats didn’t win because they deserved to win. I think they won because they devised and executed a winning strategy
Rangel needs to be stopped. But, while we're at it, maybe we could learn a thing or two from him.
Their strategy was to elect DINOs to closely-fought districts. It may come back to haunt them, though they have stronger whips than the Republicans.
“This plan would make the economy tank.....”
More than stupid...think malignant. Dems only find opportunity in their fellow Americans’ misery....
I was thinking the history made was a sitting Senator being charged with treason for his slander and vile words against our troops and the GWOT.
Yes it does and that is why they pay the AMT.
$200k for a family of five in San Francisco puts them in Fresno.
I live near Mark Foley’s distric, and the R’s have hammered his Dem successor since the day he was elected with radio ads. They are not asleep.
Glad to hear it.
“$200k for a family of five in San Francisco puts them in Fresno.”
Fresno? More like Madera!
They could be yuppies in Tijuana.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.