Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hellary's chilling honesty
Worldnetdaily ^ | September 17, 2007 | Doug Powers

Posted on 09/17/2007 8:49:42 AM PDT by stratboy

Hillary Clinton and her husband, Bill Rodham, are being completely honest in this presidential campaign of theirs. I know, I know, it's startling, but the Dynamic Duo of Deceit and Deception is, for once, being very up front on two major campaign themes without parsing words with an atom splitter. Those two themes are "we'll be safer" and "you will no longer be invisible to your government." This might sound hunky-dory to some voters, but the methods they'll use to attain both are what deserve scrutiny. As you know, another fundraising scandal has been swirling around Hillary – a revelation as shocking as waking up to find the sun rising in the East and Larry Craig insisting he's not gay.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anointedbymsm; clinton; clintoncorruption; hillary; queenhill; socialism; yourthighness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Amusing read.
1 posted on 09/17/2007 8:49:45 AM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stratboy

“you will no longer be invisible to your government.” You bet you won’t. They’ll find you and raise your taxes so you have no control over your lifestyle and they’ll have the power with all the money.


2 posted on 09/17/2007 8:57:09 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

“Allegedly, after “discovering” the felonious history of Norman Hsu, the Hillary Clinton campaign vowed to require all major fundraisers to submit to a criminal background check.

Anybody who passes the background check will of course be kicked off her campaign.

Seriously though, if Hillary’s going to be checking fundraisers for criminal records, the only way to add complete integrity to the process is to make sure it also works the other way around, but don’t hold your breath. “

There is no honor amongst thieves and liars.


3 posted on 09/17/2007 8:57:41 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

“The Clintons insist that we were safer when Bill Clinton was president. Now that Hillary’s running, they’re asking Americans if they want to go back to those peaceful times when there were only five destructive missiles launched in eight years – two at Afghanistan, two at Sudan and the one documented in the Starr Report.”

The republicans need to keep reminding people of this.


4 posted on 09/17/2007 8:58:22 AM PDT by nuconvert ("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

In 2002 she stated WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THINGS FROM YOU FOR THE COMMON GOOD,the MSM keeps that statement well hid.


5 posted on 09/17/2007 9:01:30 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
...Dynamic Duo of Deceit and Deception...

Outstanding article by Doug Powers! Thank you, Doug!

6 posted on 09/17/2007 9:06:30 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Actually she said that in June 2004, which is all the more surprising because the economy was doing much better then than just two or three years earlier.


7 posted on 09/17/2007 9:14:04 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

“COMMON GOOD” = Socialism and/or Communism


8 posted on 09/17/2007 9:15:04 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nmh

“Anybody who passes the background check will of course be kicked off her campaign.” But, but...........this would mean Hillary wouldn’t have a campaign.....that’s just not fair. It wouldn’t be for the “Common Good”.


9 posted on 09/17/2007 9:17:07 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
"you will no longer be invisible to your government"

Scary.

I always want to be as invisible as possible to people who want to confiscate my money.

10 posted on 09/17/2007 9:18:39 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (I'm With Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
we'll be safer" and "you will no longer be invisible to your government."
Yeup. we'll have virtually no guns, (she'll take away by executive order). We'll have cameras on every corner (just like jolly ol' England),we'll be monitored and tracked, registered here and there..Yeup-won't be invisible anymore..(but I like invisible)
11 posted on 09/17/2007 9:31:58 AM PDT by Aut Pax Aut Bellum (Try to look unimportant, the enemy may be low on ammo...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

Imagine of the government decided that absoultely everyone’s whole paycheck would be intercepted and confiscated, the net to be distributed by them back to the earners by direct deposit into their bank account.
The state intercepts and confiscated all child support, distributed back to the custodial parent after the parent has been made a ward of the state.


12 posted on 09/17/2007 9:38:39 AM PDT by Excellence (Bacon bits make great confetti.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


HillaryScare 2007

13 posted on 09/17/2007 9:52:51 AM PDT by devolve ( ------- ---When fiction becomes reality things get wet--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

bookmarked for later


14 posted on 09/17/2007 9:55:26 AM PDT by Gone_Postal (We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
“you will no longer be invisible to your government.”

And the Dims are complaining about Bush's surveillance. The possibility of Hillary taking over is one of the concerns I have about such surveillance being allowed. She will no longer need to order a bunch of FBI files to her office -- she can just get the NSA to give her the dirt on anyone she wants.

15 posted on 09/17/2007 9:59:03 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gone_Postal

“Their aggressive and acquisitive instincts will under our control. We shall.....take care of them”. Norman - I, Mudd

Hillery....Dear! Shut Up!


16 posted on 09/17/2007 9:59:50 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Today the She-beast revealed a huge billions and billions and billions of dollars’ health plan that makes socialism look like free enterprise. And the sad thing is, the underachievers, the non-productive in our society will eat it up and they will be registered to vote by Chuckie Schumer,especially in the Senate races. One more step to EU socialism.


17 posted on 09/17/2007 10:00:43 AM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Nice post. Hillary and honesty are an oxymoron!!


18 posted on 09/17/2007 10:31:04 AM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Rush is quoting a Klintoon WH healthcare “expert” who is claiming the 1993 healthcare plan was Slick Willie’s - not Hillary’s

Hillary is saying her new healthcare plan is not the 1993 plan

Bill now takes the blame for the ‘93 failure - Hillary - made suddenly famous and elected to the Senate because of her whacko Commie 1993 healthcare plan - does not have the experience that she claimed she had for 13 years?


19 posted on 09/17/2007 10:41:05 AM PDT by devolve ( ------- ---When fiction becomes reality things get wet--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Lol, I repeat my previous comment. They are both oxymorons!!


20 posted on 09/17/2007 10:44:52 AM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson