Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chaos_5
1. Tobacco
2. Pharmaceuticals

Both industries have been sued for harm done by their government regulated products.

And yet they're both still in business ... and others, such as brewers and distillers, have never been sued (AFAIK). Pretty weak argument for nonregulation.

(So do you agree that enriching criminals is bad policy?)

57 posted on 09/19/2007 12:08:26 PM PDT by Murray the R (When they say "market based" keep a hand on your wallet; when they say "compassion" go for your gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Murray the R
Think about this.
Do you want the government regulating your marijuana?
Do you want to work in a store where if you sold the stuff to some on, you can get sued when the customer get high and kills somebody in a car accident? Like bar tenders.
Do you wan to be arrested for growing stuff that is to strong? Like brewing moon shine?

Look, bottom line, if you left the government regulate the stuff, you loose freedoms, and are liable to adhere to their regulations. The could very well say, only skank weed is ok for sale and distribution. Now, you may know a fellow who grows the “good stuff”, guess what, its still illegal. Why? Regulations.

I have no idea why all the “legalize marijuana” dope heads don't get it. If you regulate it, it will suck! Don't let big brother in on this, just argue for decriminalization.

58 posted on 09/19/2007 12:17:29 PM PDT by chaos_5 (... I'm just another angry white male ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson