Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BfloGuy

No one, and I mean no one, understood that at the time NAFTA was signed it would involve the transportation of goods.


21 posted on 09/18/2007 8:26:25 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

LOL!


22 posted on 09/18/2007 8:30:18 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy
No one, and I mean no one, understood that at the time NAFTA was signed it would involve the transportation of goods.

Baloney. In fact, I would make the case from the standpoint of the U.S., NAFTA was specifically aimed at two products whose transportation is an integral part of their production and consumption -- oil and natural gas.

30 posted on 09/18/2007 9:13:11 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson