[Man50D]

It's amazing how thoroughly ignorant someone can be when they write articles like this about topics they don't know anything about. There has been a "NAFTA super-railway" for some years now -- and if Corsi had done some research on Canadian National Railway he would have learned this before revealing his ignornance in print.

It's amazing you can't see the forest for the trees. The Canadian National Railways only existed on a map but did not become a physical entity until the merger of those railways on September 4, 2007. If you clicked on the links you would also seen similar announcement of the mergers. If you had bothered to heed you own advice and read the article more carefully you would have avoided revealing your own ignorance.

[Alberta's Child]

I think you're getting two railroads confused . . . Canadian Pacific (CP) and Canadian National (CN).

The September 4th merger involved Canadian Pacific. Canadian National, on the other hand, has been called "the NAFTA railroad" for almost a decade -- basically since it formed its current T-shaped network configuration with the acquisition of the Illinois Central in 1998.

[Ben Ficklin]

The battle between the forces of darkness and light will continue until the second coming of Devil Reagan, who will usher in an eternal and everlasting period of Market Capitalism in which all the world’s children will have plastic jack-o-lanterns and polyester bunny rabbits brought to them by the evil railroads.

[Alberta's Child]

I think I should have been more clear about the distinction between Canadian Pacific and Canadian National in my original post about Corsi’s article. :-)

[Mr. Lucky]

You should probably apologize.

[Plains Drifter]

Bump