Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Owen

‘There has to be a conservative approach or the Democrats will have the issue all to themselves.’

The last time this was attempted, in 1993, that wasn’t necessary. All that was required was noting 7% of the economy would fall under goverment control, then pointing out no other Federal Program has been ‘successful’ enough for this to be considered by intelligent people already receiving the best healthcare in the world.

If the President wants to get into this, he should go to the United Nations and ask they intervene in the war being waged by the Trial Lawyers Association against the AMA, specifically ob/gyn’s.

The doctors are being ‘massacred’. Stop the killing....of the medical profession by the John Edward’s of the world.


41 posted on 09/18/2007 8:20:10 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Badeye

No, you misunderstood. The Bush conservative approach was STRICTLY a tax policy that provided people the ability to make their own choices. Credits and deductions would be provided based on the choices made by the people. There would be no new government bureaucracy.

Look at this carefully. Bush’s SOTU proposal is the ONLY counter on the conservative side to the Democrat government control plans for universal health coverage.


50 posted on 09/18/2007 8:30:06 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson