Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dobson Says He Won't Support Thompson
AP ^ | 9/19/07 | Erik Gorski

Posted on 09/19/2007 7:14:10 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,341-1,343 next last
To: pissant
I was once told that when you write an email, write it as if it would be published on the front page of the newspaper. There is always a chance that is may end up there.
21 posted on 09/19/2007 7:24:56 PM PDT by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Well, heck, then there’s just no one left to endorse but Ron Paul or a Democrat.....


22 posted on 09/19/2007 7:25:50 PM PDT by Alright_on_the_LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

this is a FWIW type article. I’ll let the Fredheads go after him, I’ll stay out of it.


23 posted on 09/19/2007 7:26:11 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Figures he’s going for McCain.

Huh?

24 posted on 09/19/2007 7:26:21 PM PDT by xjcsa (Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Karl Marx with huge calves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
You make a big mistake underestimating the influence of Dobson. Your 153 may be more like a half million maybe more.
25 posted on 09/19/2007 7:26:33 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Why does the Thompson campaign keep saying he has a “100%” totally total pro-life record? What is their standard? He is obviously indifferent on abortion.
26 posted on 09/19/2007 7:26:38 PM PDT by ridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Isn't Thompson the candidate who is opposed to a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, believes there should be 50 different definitions of marriage in the U.S...."

Because, Jim, it isn't the business of the federal government to engage in social engineering even when the results are those that you think you'd like. If you want that kind of government then go to the former Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Cuba, the People's Republic of China, or Venezuela or get a bunch of folks to follow you to some place out in the middle of Guyana (or one of the Carolinas).
27 posted on 09/19/2007 7:26:43 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I respect James Dobson,but I’ll make my decision by myself. If he doesn’t like Fred Thompson then he shouldn’t vote for him,but I’ll vote for whom I believe to be the best candidate regardless of James Dobson !!!


28 posted on 09/19/2007 7:26:53 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

not true. this just killed thompson’s nomination. he’s now a dead man walking. a zombie. sad but true.


29 posted on 09/19/2007 7:27:05 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“Dobson and other Christian conservatives support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would bar gay marriage nationally. Thompson has said he would support a constitutional amendment that would prohibit states from imposing their gay marriage laws on other states, which falls well short of that.”

I’m with Fred on that one too. Dobson and others like him want the Feds to impose THEIR beliefs on the states but not other people’s beliefs. They can’t have it both ways. The likes of marriage, abortion, drinking age, speed limits, etc. are all STATE issues. I’m sorry but you can’t legislate morality and you should not even try. The federal government is too much involved in things the constitution doesn’t give them permission to be involved in and marriage is one of them.

Oh, and by the way, I’m a former youth pastor, so my Christian credentials are solid.


30 posted on 09/19/2007 7:27:18 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (We accommodate other cultures at the expense of ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

AJ is picking up a few fans. LOL


31 posted on 09/19/2007 7:27:24 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: quark

I don’t think so.

I watched Romney on Fox and Friends the other day because, although he hasn’t caught fire with me, I think he’s a decent guy and I wanted to check him out in this venue.

He comes across as bland. Sorry, but the Fox & Friends people, goofy as they can be, had more personality and presence than Mitt did.

Fred has presence. I like what he says about religion. It is a private matter and nobody agrees with anybody else about it anyway.

I wonder who Dobson thinks he can find to support. Maybe he should just not say anything for a while.


32 posted on 09/19/2007 7:28:01 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant
More important than who Dobson wont vote for, who WOULD he vote for of those running. I would hope, Hunter.
33 posted on 09/19/2007 7:28:32 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; fieldmarshaldj; Politicalmom; NewRomeTacitus

This is absurd!

Fred Thompson is running for Commander In Chief, not Preacher In Chief.


34 posted on 09/19/2007 7:29:33 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridge

They can say it because he voted for the restrictions that were before him in Congress. He was always for restrictions, but pro-choice. Now he’s apparently pro-life. Just not enough to criminalize it in the first trimester or support a constitutional amendment to end it.


35 posted on 09/19/2007 7:30:05 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

He already said he would not support McCain.


36 posted on 09/19/2007 7:30:21 PM PDT by commonguymd (Move it to the right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

You cannot legislate moral values.


37 posted on 09/19/2007 7:30:50 PM PDT by Pistolshot (Keyes/Paul '08 - When you can't get crazy enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Since I have never heard of this Dobson guy, this doesn’t mean much to me.


38 posted on 09/19/2007 7:31:13 PM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Let it be known that I DO SUPPORT James Dobson for even dog catcher:-()
39 posted on 09/19/2007 7:31:31 PM PDT by geo40xyz ((Born a democRAT, Dad set me free in 1952: He said that I was not required to be a MF'ing democRAT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, that’s rather unfortunate. FRed represents our best shot at defeating Rudy McRomney and keeping our pro-life and liberty conservative coalition together.


40 posted on 09/19/2007 7:32:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,341-1,343 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson