Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vietvet67
Her congressman, Representative Mike Thompson, Democrat of California, quickly introduced legislation at her behest to force airlines to let passengers off stranded planes after three hours, with two 30-minute extensions at the pilot's discretion.

This is still basically imprisonment for up to 4 hours in conditions far more confined than a jail cell, since the plane is going nowhere. Maybe someone more knowledgeable about airport operations can clue me in - if a plane is required to sit on the tarmac for a significant length of time, why can't passengers be removed using shuttles and given the choice to wait inside the airport or cancel their tickets and go home?
5 posted on 09/20/2007 10:19:46 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AnotherUnixGeek

One thing that would have to happen is to shut down the engines so people could safely move from one place to another on the tarmac. I don’t know how long the APU would hold out for once the engines are off.


10 posted on 09/20/2007 10:29:05 AM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AnotherUnixGeek; lilylangtree; fatnotlazy; wastedyears; Kozak; Mr. Jeeves; ...

This thread seems to be studiously ignoring the elephant in the airport. Namely WHY are there so many long delays, and many more that are much shorter but still a significant inconvenience and totally unnecessary?

As with most problems, this one is caused by government. The Department of Transportation publishes official reports of “on time departure” rates for the various airlines, and “departure” is defined as pulling away from the gate within 15 minutes of scheduled departure time. The airlines then use these official figures in their advertising. Those passengers imprisoned on the tarmac for several hours are nearly always on flights which had “on time departures”. If the plane goes back to the gate, it no longer counts as an “on time departure”. If it sits on the tarmac for 12 hours, it’s still an “on time departure”.

Only one simple change is needed, but government is notoriously poor at making simple changes that are needed. Report “on time ARRIVALS”, not departures.


30 posted on 09/20/2007 12:02:27 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
why can't passengers be removed using shuttles

And if I have to take the metal ladder off the plane down to the tarmac and walk 400 yards to the terminal, fine. I'd rather do that than sit for hours.

62 posted on 10/05/2007 8:45:03 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Oh, the huge manatee!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson