That’s it!
I’m moving to Mars! Who’s with me?
Well, at least he considers nuclear power an alternative.
Meanwhile this morning it was 42 degrees at our house in LA County (mountains).
Yeah, that'll fix it! The UN does so well...............
Named by whom?
Does this factor in the recently discovered Y2K errors in NASA’s temperature data? I’m guessing no.
OK....everyone....hold your breath!
He’s way wrong here. Econutjobs have been projecting the complete melting of the Antarctic Ice Cap by 2030 for nearly 30 years now, and nothing of the sort has even begun to happen.
I can’t wait until they retire the salt trucks in my area!
About a year ago AlGore gave us only about 10 years to begin massive global transfers of wealth (buying his carbon credits) to third world countries or global warming would consume us.
Now it's much, much worse, I guess it's now already too late, so live it up!
From what I've heard, sea levels aren't rising at all.
If anybody has any data on actual sea level changes, as opposed to projected ones, I'd like to see it.
This would have the lovely side-effect of completely defunding Saudi Arabia and the other terror sponsors.
Climate change worse than feared: Australian expert (We’re all gonna die! cont.)
____________________________________________________________
“Women and minorities, hardest hit”
2. Those most keen on convincing the rest of us that the climate is changing seem to not comprehend that that's what it does.
Chill!!!!!!!
There is an easy and quick fix if in fact the Arctic is melting.
Simply put Hillary at the North Pole!!!!!!!
Hey, do it even if it isn’t melting too!!!!!!!!!
"In the six years since then, we've collected enough data to (check) whether those projections are valid or not," he said.
How much is "enough data"? How do you determine a projection for a time period that has not occurred yet is valid or not? Did the original projection determine interim results?
It turns out..Most horrible way.....far in advance...."It turns out they're not valid, but in the most horrible way -- because for the key performance indicators about climate, change is occurring far in advance of the worst-case scenario," he said.
Scientific terminology?
"Carbon dioxide's increasing more rapidly, sea levels are rising more rapidly (and) the Arctic ice cap is melting away more quickly than were projected in 2001."More rapidly than what ?
"The 21st century is going to be about environmental limits," he said.Its not going to be about the OJ trial?
"There's six billion of us on the planet, there will soon be nine billion, the atmosphere is tiny as a pollution receptacle, clearly that's going to be where the action is.Soon we will have 9 billion. How soon? How will so many people come about when we have no food, land or resources after global warming destroys the earth?
"But we haven't yet built the structures, the new version of the UN that helps us deal with the global pollution crisis as a species."If the old version of the UN let us destroy the earth by failing to control global warming how will the new improved version work. Oh yeah, and how in the world is a scientist an expert on global goverment?
I thought I saw a report earlier this week that the Pacific Ocean temperature had peaked and was beginning to cool.
Of course this story was not picked up by the mainstream media.
The last couple night one of the evening news programs has been playing the ice melting in Greenland; of course, the story did not provided the background that the Viking’s settlers had farmed some of this same land during the Middle Ages.