Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Those reports are very sketchy and don’t shed any light on the medical facts. Instead, they raise more questions than they answer.

For instance, why is a Physician Assistant making a report about blood clots 3 hours after a shot? A rapid allergic reaction such as the one reported so soon after a shot should tell us more that the patient had a blood clot. Was there shortness of breath, hives and the other signs of an anaphylactic reaction?

Furthermore, 3 deaths that occurred over a range of time, from three hours to months, appears to be due more to the fact that these conditions happen to a certain number of people, whether or not they receive a shot.


43 posted on 09/20/2007 4:49:17 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hocndoc

Keep in mind that the profile of the patients. They are generally young and healthy. The incidence of clots , Bell’s Palsey, Guillain Barre etc is EXTREMELY low.

These are exceptions and would qualify as adverse results in any clinical trial.


132 posted on 09/21/2007 6:26:23 AM PDT by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson