Now, the charge of “disorderly conduct” - on your own property - is absolutely bogus, and that should cost the deputy and the sheriff their jobs.
Maybe I don’t understand you but those two statements seem to contradict each other.
In the first you say that the Sheriff’s department is not to blame and in the second you say that they should lose their jobs.
Sorry, wasn’t clear enough.
There’s two things she can sue for. The article makes it sound as tho she’s going after GTC for monetary damages.
That is who should be sued for the money side of this. There’s no point in asking the sheriff’s department for money. You’re not going to get a monetary award from a civil servant that will punish the civil servant and make them quit doing this. All government sovereigns have insurance policies and bonds for events like this, and suing the sheriff for money won’t make a bit of difference to him. he gets to keep his job and he isn’t out of pocket so much as a dime.
Now, going after the sheriff for abusing her civil rights - and getting a conviction - that’s gonna cost the sheriff and the deputy their jobs. But the article makes it sound as tho they’re not doing this (yet). They’re going after money, and what I’m saying (poorly) is that GTC is the place to get the money for damages, etc.