[ml/nj]

none of the eyewitness provided anything that was consistant with a MANPAD attack.

This is certainly a Clintonesque reply.

I have never suggested that the missile which downed TWA 800 was a MANPAD. In fact, I believe I have refuted this idea.

You said you wanted evidence that a missile downed TWA 800. Not all missiles are MANPADS.

And while the eyewitness accounts might not be consistent with a MANPAD attack, they are certainly not consistent the idea that no missile at all was involved.

ML/NJ

[Perdogg]

I feel insulted now. I wasn’t attempting to give you a Clintonesque response. I have mentioned before that people who believe the missile theory would have to accept the possibility that a Naval missile downed the plane, which very few are willing to do.