“We disagree, their missionary service was exemplary (not equalto military service though)and not self serving, but more on that later.”
Believe it our not spending two years in France trying to convert people to his cult is not seen as a positive to the rest of us, and it is self serving.
A Hare Krishna offering his dedicated service working the airport crowd for two years, in place of wearing the uniform of our country would be laughed at also.
Conservatives will always fight liberal family dynasties that try to take over the Republican party, it is kind of what we do, but I shouldn’t have to explain to a freeper.
LOL, oh puhleese, stop the hyperbole, it's hardly a Liberal family dynasty. His father lost. Mitt's been involved in business not politics most of his adult life, except for his failed bid for the Senate in 1994 and his past four years as governor.
Furthermore, Mitt's running on a conservative platform, which is the same as the Republican party. No true liberal I know, has EVER run on a conservative platform.....not Arlen Spector, not Olympia Snowe, not Rudy Giuiliani to name a few. They have all run on Liberal platforms, which practically speaking is where I draw the line.
Freepers and REAL conservatives keep their eye on the ball. We defeat true liberals and Democrats, of which, Mitt is neither. In this election we must defeat Liberal Giuliani (whose nomination would destroy the Republican party) running on a Liberal platform (at odds with the Republican Party) and Hillary.
As Rush said, 'I'll take a Mormon over a Liberal or a Democrat any day.' As Ann Coulter (also favorable to Mitt Romney and Duncan Hunter said) Mormons vote Republican, and are one of the groups most loyal to the Republican party.