Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
I've heard this argument before - it includes people it really shouldn't just for the sake of fluffing up the numbers. Active duty military personnel are not "serfs" nor should they be categorized like that for the sake of academic argument - it's false!
4 posted on 09/22/2007 4:57:15 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ken522
Active duty military personnel are not "serfs" nor should they be categorized

Um, yes they are. The only difference is their serfdom is not hereditary. They're worked harder than serfs on the manor, too.

6 posted on 09/22/2007 5:05:52 PM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Ken522
I understand why you are uncomfortable putting military folks in the same category as civilians.

However the economic point remains valid. If more folks are dependent on a government paycheck (earned or unearned, important and vital jobs as well as stupid ones) they have a vested interest in keeping government at least as large as it is at present.

The possible flaw in the model in my view is how spouses are treated if one works for the government and another works in the private sector.
13 posted on 09/22/2007 5:40:14 PM PDT by cgbg (Smokers are the enemy of Hillary's socialist Utopia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Ken522
I've read that outside the military, America now has upwards of 20,000,000 people on the government payroll, this includes city, local, state and federal governments.

That's 20 million.

34 posted on 09/22/2007 6:44:33 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson