Replies

But with the collection destroyed, they can “never” prove that they didn’t have it.

I say they did. I was there. I know what I saw. And there are three Postal Inspection Agents who are keenly aware that I exist and are working on this.

I thought it would take time to find the guy in the vet school that mailed it out of there. It took me a year, but I now know where he is.

He is probably reading this right now!!

It has been 13 months since I found him, and I found him on the Internet thanks to a liberal university and another vet with an overgrown ego.

At that time, I said that it would take Special Ops a year to get into place and catch him with the goods.

Now the political situation in that country has deteriorated. Push has come to shove.

Notice that between WTC 93 and 9-11, there were no loud threats...we’re gonna get this done. Other than the one comment from Ranzi Yousef. (Casual remark while sitting on the airplane)

There has been no claim of responsibility....to me this really stands out....they are very happy to have us use vast resources to chase Hatfill. They will do it again, or at least try. The avenue may not be the mail. We sorta plugged that hole.

But there are still intricate political barriers to solving this.

And...am I right? Or did I see a duplicate theft?

“I say they did. I was there. I know what I saw. And there are three Postal Inspection Agents who are keenly aware that I exist and are working on this.”

Battle Axe. when did they visit? A year and a half ago? Am I right you’ve had no further contact or further confirmation they are “working on it”?

You can’t determine the genetic strain by a drip recalled a decade later.

You never saw a theft.

You have no indication the fellow is islamist.

You have never bothered to contact him.

You never bothered to contact the ISU professors and instead just assumed the ISU inventory had Ames — making the same error that Boyle makes by confusing the ISU with the USDA lab.

So it was stupid to destroy the inventory rather than just courier it over to USDA for safekeeping — and thus their security argument does not make sense as USDA was a secure facility.

But you are engaged in speculation without taking the basic steps relevant to inquiry.

More importantly, an argument that the feds allowed relevant evidence to be destroyed will only undermine a prosecution. For all you know, the guy you think located is a Free Mason.

Always start with a bad guy and motive before looking too hard for access. Otherwise, you end up with a Zack theory.