Iran Hitler Ahmadinejad At Columbia - Free Speech Or Incitement?

Jerusalem ----September 23...... As one who studied at Columbia University, I am both embarrassed and ashamed of that fact today. Columbia University in New York City had one of the finest journalism schools in the US, that is until Columbia invited Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran to speak at Columbia tomorrow.

The Iran President left Tehran for New York today and will participate in a question and answer forum at Columbia tomorrow. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is traveling to New York to address the United Nations' General Assembly.

Ya see, I live and work in Israel, a tiny, democratic nation in the Middle East which Ahmadinejad has sworn to "wipe my children off the map." Not really a nice thing of this dictator who fashions himself after Adolf Hitler with a twist of Islamic lemon to say.

Ahmadinejad's Iran is one of the world's leading sponsors of international terror, especially the Hizbullah gang in Lebanon, and he is now obsessed with building thermonuclear weapons with which he might just accomplish what Hitler could not: the annihilation of half the world's Jews with the push of a single button.

Ahmadinejad is also directly responsible for the murder of dozens of numbers of American troops in Iraq, whose killers, according to hundreds of reliable reports, he is arming and funding.

The US State Department calls Iran a state sponsor of terror, and Ahmadinejad has called the Holocaust ``a myth'' and urges for Israel to be destroyed.

Why would Columbia University desire to have Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speak on their campus?

Is it freedom of speech or is it marketing? Is it marketing at the expense of incitement to commit genocide against the civilian population of Israel?

Columbia acknowledged last week that the visit to the university of Iran terror leader Ahmadinejad was initiated not by the university but by the Iran envoy to the United Nations through a faculty member, Richard Bulliet.

This was an excellent public relations speaking engagement placement made by Iran. Something that the William Morris Agency would have been proud of (the placement - not Ahmadinejad).

Bulliet is described as having been criticized for, among other things, "his views on the Israel Palestinian conflict as overly favoring the Palestinian cause" and also for offering "qualified support" for the revolution that brought the mullahs to power in Iran in 1979.

"If Hitler were in the United States and wanted a platform from which to speak, he would have plenty of platforms to speak in the United States," Columbia's Coatsworth said in an interview with Fox News. "If he were willing to engage in debate and a discussion to be challenged by Columbia students and faculty, we would certainly invite him."

A former professor of history at Harvard, Coatsworth is dean of the university's School of International and Public Affairs, whose graduates, according to a statement Coatsworth issued last week, "serve as diplomats, intelligence analysts, security experts, business leaders, human rights activists," and leaders of non-governmental organizations.

But even if Hitler would have been, or Ahmadinejad is, welcome at Columbia, would an Egypt tribal leader be invited to defend female genital mutilation, a practice the Egyptian government is finally trying to ban? What about the current president of Sudan, or the leader of the Janjaweed militia that is committing genocide in Darfur?

Last week, the university's president offered his own defense of the invitation. "The event will be part of the annual World Leaders Forum, the University-wide initiative intended to further Columbia's longstanding tradition of serving as a major forum for robust debate, especially on global issues," he said in a press statement.

When Columbia's president states: "World Leaders" is he focusing on world leaders who serve as examples of democracy and freedom or global sponsors of terrorism?

"In order to have such a University-wide forum, we have insisted that a number of conditions be met, first and foremost that Iran President Ahmadinejad agree to divide his time evenly between delivering remarks and responding to audience questions. I also wanted to be sure the Iranians understood that I would myself introduce the event with a series of sharp challenges to the president on issues including: The Iranian president's denial of the Holocaust."

Ahmadinejad has already expounded on this issue, as recently as yesterday during the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur when he introduced and showed off his new Ghadr long range missile that had a sign on it saying: "Israel must be destroyed."

"His reported support for international terrorism that targets innocent civilians and American troops."

Ahmadinejad is a man of action, barbaric action. How many Israeli civilians did he murder this year through his Hezbollah puppets in Lebanon and Syria, how may US soldiers did he kill in Iraq?

Ahmadinejad has answered this question as well telling the United Nations to go to hell.

So if these fundamental questions have already been asked and answered then what is this exercise taking place at Columbia tomorrow? It is a marketing event. A marketing event which has backfired on Columbia. A marketing stunt poised as free speech when all know that it is nothing less than a hate speech to be delivered.

Does US INTEL, the CIA, military intelligence and the NSA really need to hear something new by Ahmadinejad that satellites and microwave surveillance have not already picked up?

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) called on Columbia University to reconsider its decision to host Iran's president.

A similar invitation to Ahmadinejad was revoked last year by Columbia President Lee Bollinger.

David Feith, CC ’09 and editor of the Jewish affairs publication The Current, expressed his concern directly to Bollinger that there was a difference between refusing to suppress hateful speech and actively inviting and providing a platform for it. Bollinger responded that the invitation very well may serve to help controversial speakers, but that the negative is “far outweighed by the importance of confronting ideas and not shielding ourselves from the world as it is.”

"It is inappropriate and a perversion of the concept of freedom of speech," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. "Columbia University has no moral imperative, no legal imperative, no social imperative to give Ahmadinejad a platform, which he would not give them in Tehran. Why give him the credibility and the respectability of a major institution of higher learning? What message does that send to the students? This is not what the First Amendment is all about."

In a letter to President Bollinger, the ADL said it was "extremely dismayed" by the university's invitation to the Iranian President, who has repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel and has made remarks denying the Holocaust, and Bollinger's plans to personally introduce him at the forum. The League noted Iran's support for international terrorism and his country's ambition to acquire nuclear weapons as reasons enough not to provide Ahmadinejad a platform at Columbia.

"Last year, Columbia almost made the same mistake," said Mr. Foxman. "Ahmadinejad didn't get better since then. He's gotten worse."

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Friday that the university was free to invite Ahmadinejad to speak, but "personally, I wouldn't go to listen to him - I don't care about what he says."

White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto said Friday that the Bush administration had no involvement with Columbia's decision.

"This is a country where people can come and speak their minds," he said, adding, "It would be wonderful if some of the countries that take advantage of that here allowed it for their own citizens there."

It was reported today that Iran's judiciary is to have shut down the offices of a news Website critical of Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The Mehr News Agency reports that Baztab, a Website close to the former head of the Revolutionary Guards Mohsen Rezaie, had been banned in April and is the subject of a legal complaint from the Iran presidency.

Will Ahmadinejad's Columbia speech and question and answer be made available to the citizens of Iran. Will the citizens of Iran witness thousands of New Yorkers telling Ahmadinejad to go home?

No way. Iran will edit out and censor the negative and use the positive to incite the Iran and Islamic public. Does Columbia care?

Ahmadinejad's trip to New York also created a debate this week over his rejected request to lay a wreath at 9/11's Ground Zero. Politicians and families of Sept. 11 victims were outraged that Iran's president might visit the site.

New York Police rejected Ahmadinejad's request, citing construction and security concerns.

President George W Bush backed New York authorities in blocking a Ground Zero tour, saying, "I can understand why they would not want somebody running a country who is the state sponsor of terror down at the site."

The Iran leader said before leaving Tehran earlier Sunday that the visit would allow him to meet independent politicians from Tehran's arch foe and provide Iran a platform to address the international community.

"The General Assembly of the United Nations is a good opportunity to present the solutions of the Iranian people to solve the problems of the world," he was quoted as saying by the Fars News Agency.

"We need to take advantage of such opportunities to present the positions of the Iranian people as they (the Americans) are very keen to hear them." That is what Ahmadinejad wants his voters at home to think. And Columbia is giving it to them.

Jewish organizations in the United States are planning large-scale demonstrations, involving thousands of protesters this week to express their growing anger at Columbia University's invitation to Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Gillerman, also likened the Iranian president to Adolf Hilter, and said that a proposed visit by Ahmadinejad to Ground Zero would be similar to a visit to the site by the Nazi fuehrer.

A team of lawyers, led by Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz, are seeking to have Ahmadinejad arrested upon his arrival in New York.

"He is an international war criminal," Dershowitz told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. "He has repeatedly violated the anti-genocide convention. He is as guilty as the Rwandans who are convicted and sentenced to years in prison for inciting genocide."

Now we will see how much guts George W. Bush really has. Will he, will the Governor or Mayor of New York have this "diplomat" arrested, detained and held for the World Court as a criminal, as a terrorist or will Ahmadinejad be protected by so-called diplomatic immunity?

One thing is certain. Columbia University has now placed a commercial marketing event, a cash generating PR effort over the lives of Israel civilians and US troops in Iraq.

Paul Joseph Goebbels, the leader of the NSDAP's propaganda machine and Hitler minister responsible of all Nazi propaganda would have been proud.

Since 1995, the Israel News Agency has been vigilant on behalf of Israel, 365 days a years, 24 hours a day.

Related Websites:
Israel Watching Iran, Syria, Islamic Terrorists On Yom Kippur

“As one who studied at Columbia University, I am both embarrassed and ashamed of that fact today.”

I have a question to those who call themselves Jews. You see, the Christians and the Conservatives within the US have always backed the state of Israel and we generally tend to view favorably the Jewish faith which we see closely tied to our own. Yet why does the majority of Jews vote Democrat? Why are there so many little Barbara Streisand’s running around backing a party of Clinton, Carter........ It seems a little paradoxical to me.

Then order your secretary of state to tell AhmaNutJob that he may not be anywhere but the airport, his hotel and the UN building and that he must go directly from one to the other.

The man is not a citizen, nor even really a legal visitor in the normal sense. We do not even have diplomatic relations with the country he is the a leader of. (Remember the Ayatollah is the real leader). We have no obligation to let the man speak or appear in our country.

There is a distinction between free speech and yelling that there is a fire in a theater. There is a distinction between yelling that there is a fire in a theater and bombing the theater!

Bush should do what JFK did when Castro visited in 1963.
Restrict the terrorist to the airport, the hotel and the UN.

Anything more than that will have the US aiding and abetting a State department listed terrorist.

If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

There are conservative and liberal Jews as there are conservative and liberal Christians, Muslims etc. Orthodox Jews are mostly conservative and many voted Republican in the last presidential election.

Thank God we live in a country where we have the freedom to practice the religion of our choice... including conservative or liberal versions of it.

Hate is not unlike 'fire' - when yelled in a crowded theater. It is context. . .location and intent. . .

Ahmadinejad is an arsonist of the most heinous and dangerous order.

I don’t have any problem at all with the invitation - provided that Columbia abolishes its speech code and invites David Duke to present the next lecture. The university president just said it’s all about hearing different ideas didn’t he?

What does the LEFT think will be accomplished by giving Ahmadinejad a forum? That he will change and we can all have a Cumbiya moment? Have they forgot that “The Medium is the Message”

What does the LEFT think will be accomplished by giving Ahmadinejad a forum?

Columbia is securing headlines. Cashing in on a global PR marketing event at the expense of every Israeli, every US soldier based in Iraq, every living person and all those who have perished defending democracy from Islamic terrorism.

The wicked little Haman runt speaking at Columbia is just plain and simple incitment, like yelling “fire” in a crowded theater when there isn’t a fire. That any US institution would even think of having such trash come to speak, that the US would even let such trash into the country to speak and the U-bloddy-effing-N, is beyond all standards of decency. May this nasty little runt meet the same fate as the biblical Haman.

We all should be aware that the rants of the Iranian thug looks suspiciously like the DNC, Moveon, Kosite and Pelosi, Murtha, Durbin, Clinton, Obama talking points. I wonder if the lazy GOP will point that out to people!?

It’s somewhat odd to me but, these rants of Add-Mini-Dumb sound all to reminiscent of the rants by Adolf going into the Munich Conference for the granting of the land he wanted from Czechoslovakia and was granted by Lord Chamberlain proclaiming “Peace in Our Time.”

Absolutely. But, remember, college students do not remember history and neither do many Dem voters. The GOP has to remind them of this over and again. Instead of spending money on generalized items, the ads should be specific on statements by the Dems on the war, Islamofascism, Iran, defeatism, raising taxes on both the middle class and the rich, and changing the courts to pure liberal brainwashing jurists. The Pubs need to rally the BASE and others who do not want a nation of socialism pacificism.

Probably because Republicans haven't always backed the state of Israel or felt warmly about American Jews.

Witness GHWB's drop from 35% of the Jewish vote in 1988 to 11% in 1992. "*uck the Jews, they don't vote for us anyway" struck a cord.

Same on the other side, Carter said virtually the same thing, and dropped from 71% in 1976 to 45% in 1980.

The idea that all Christians like Jews, and all Christians are Republicans is just silly.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.