Congress debate begins on North America Union

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | September 25, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Liz]

"The secretary of transportation came before our subcommittee," he explained, "and I had the opportunity to ask her some questions about the NAFTA Superhighway. Of course, she answered, 'There's no NAFTA Superhighway.'

TEXAS governor rapped for paving way for construction of Trans-Texas Corridor
One News Now | August 24, 2007 | Chad Groening
FR Posted on 08/25/2007 by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Texas Governor Rick Perry is being called to task by an author and investigative journalist for vetoing bills that would have blocked construction of the controversial Trans-Texas Corridor. --SNIP--

Construction of Hway in Mexico

NASCO Map of Corridor

NASCO Members: United States
Texas Dept. of Transportation
Iowa Department of Transportation
State of Oklahoma
Minnesota Dept. of Transportation
Bell County, Texas
Denton County, Texas
Tarrant County, Texas
Webb County, Texas
Jackson County, Missouri
City of Denton, Texas
City of Ft. Worth, Texas
City of Gainesville, Texas
City of Kansas City, Missouri
International Trade Institute of the Americas
Free Trade Alliance San Antonio
Port San Antonio
United States - Mexico Chamber of Commerce
Kansas City SmartPort
The Ardmore Development Authority, City of Ardmore, Oklahoma
Belton Economic Development Corporation
The Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
The Allen Group
Hillwood - Alliance Texas
The Ambassador Bridge Detroit/Windsor Crossing
American Airlines
Blackwood, Langworthy & Tyson, Kansas City law firm
Cadre Technologies
Franco Eleuteri & Associates
EWI Risk Services, Inc.
GrowthNet Trading, LLC
International Bank of Commerce
Lockheed Martin
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores
PROTECT-US, Inc.
Scrub Oak Technologies
Strasburger & Price Law Firm
Trans Am Group
Yellow Roadway Corporation Worldwide

[kindred]

This is why I will no longer vote for social liberals in the GOP party. The President himself is lying through his teeth to conservatives who voted for him and I think he, like the leftist social liberals, believe that a disator for American working class people is a good thing in the long run.
Thank God for true conservatives like Duncan Hunter who resists the Presidents plan to put more mexican trucks and truckers on the taxpayer roads. I shake my head thinking why would our rino President destroy American workers interests in pursuit of his petty ambitions.

[ovrtaxt]

NOoo!! Don’t look!

It’s all a tinfoil conspiracy theory!! The President said so!

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

Time to get on the phones,,,again...:0(

[kindred]

[I will say point-blank that if he hadn’t been pushing his anti-conservative and Globalist Agenda non-stop since ‘04...he would still have been over 50% approval. And he only has himself to blame.]

As a Christian conservative, I have never been so disappointed with a republican President as now. He is by all his actions a liberal socialist. I refuse to vote for any more social liberals of the GOP persuasion, President Bush has cured me of holding my nose and voting for the lesser of two evils. From now on, I will only vote for conservatives of the Duncan Hunter persuision.

[Fitzcarraldo]

Yes, the North American Union is just a figment of some nutjob’s imagination! Amero mi Amigo LOL Yeehah! /sarc

[stephenjohnbanker]

B T T T

[stephenjohnbanker]

B T T T

[gondramB]

>>And while you are at it, you have some explaining to do. I.e., you have to deal with the fact that DOT Secretary Mary Peters ADMITTED the existence of the Superhighway plan. Under oathe. In public testimony. So the tin-foil aspersionists have to get overthemselves and their cutesy word games. They have been busted. They counted on a pliant Congress snoozing while this was all done until it was presented as a fait accomplice.<<

Let’s assume there is a plan for a super highway that will let goods flow back and forth between Canada and Mexico .

Let’s assume this is bad for America.

Do you think that successful opposition to the highway is made more or less likely by claiming it is part of a massive century long Illuminati/CFR/BushClinton/??? conspiracy?

Now lets talk about the very real, very serious problems of border security and illegal immigration... I’ve come to the conclusion that mixing in these conspiracies actually lessens problem resolve to do something about it.

[gondramB]

That’s about the friendliest way I’ve even been told I have my head in the sand... :)

[gondramB]

>>Now lets talk about the very real, very serious problems of border security and illegal immigration... I’ve come to the conclusion that mixing in these conspiracies actually lessens problem resolve to do something about it.<<

typo, sorry about that

Now lets talk about the very real, very serious problems of border security and illegal immigration... I’ve come to the conclusion that mixing in these conspiracies actually lessens public resolve to do something about it.

[6ppc]

"Inland Ports" are not new.

I agree. All we're really talking about is making delivery of goods more efficient. It also occurs to me that having goods funnelled to a central interior location might make it easier to control security. Of course the route would have to be secure as well.

[AuntB]

The only people that call those who see this for what it is, tin foil hatters, fall into one of 2 categories. Either they support it 100% because they are as treasonous as those pushing it through. Or they are too stupid to see it for what it is.

That's been the case in TOO many situations. Immigration, Nafta, China, elections, you name it. And if there is another reason (possibly blind loyalty to a personality politician) I can't think of it.

[AuntB]

It will be Mrs. Clinton's duty to let the citizens in on this dirty little secret...:(

You're right. And if Bush gets it pushed through, she can blame him and the republicans for it.

[Paul Ross]

Do you think that successful opposition to the highway is made more or less likely by claiming it is part of a massive century long Illuminati/CFR/BushClinton/??? conspiracy?

First, you needn't belabor the sheer audacity of the scheme or its historical precursors.

Second, where there is smoke, there is fire. Almost every time a whiff of smoke surrounding Bush is noted...it is for real. From AMNESTY to the LAW OF THE SEA TREATY, the guy is up to globalist No-Goodery.

Third, note the feeble pretexts used to evade admission of White House Planning: Merely recite the clear CURRENT evidence of coordination at the top of these "Private Parties" pushing States to have a NAFTA Superhighway.

Bush is clearly unable to claim ignorance. It is his SPP that meets in secret after all. So he can be "amused" by speculations as to what they talk about. Ha, ha, ha.

And you have the Chinese investing $4 billion in a Mexican deepwater port that was previously nonexistent...an investment which obviously BANKS ON the NAFTA superhighway being a "Done Deal." Who could have possibly reassured them so persuasively to part with so much of their money, h'mmmmmm? Not the Mexican President, since it is only America that is the real destination target.

And then you have all sorts of Mexicans...big-time mayors and such... popping up and ADMITTING that the NAFTA Superhighway is both real...and... it is part of the NAU, and they urge us all to "implement it swiftly". Why swiftly? Because obviously the People are catching wise to its reality.

Then finally, take a look at the degree of desperation to push this through at all costs. You have Governor Perry committing electoral suicide in Texas by vetoing hugely popular "moratorium" legislation in the most unimaginably heavy-handed way that will destroy the GOP in Texas unless they clean house of the Toll Lobby and the Perry-ites. Odd how just some 4 months before ...Governor Perry was invited to, and attended the Bilderberger conference The pretext was that a bunch of European powers were curious about "Federal-State relations" in the U.S. Rooooooooight.....

Wake up and smell the coffee. I would be quite happy to oppose this whole thing purely on the substantive demerits it implicates. But the fact is, that those demerits should already have torpedoed it. Their failure to impede this monstrosity only highlights the probability of the corruption issue...and with associated implications of conspiracy.

We need to be unapologetic about telling the WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH:

John 8:31-32 Jesus: "If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free."

[Brandie]

Thank you for this information.

[Paul Ross]

All we're really talking about is making delivery IMPORTS of goods more efficient.

There fixed it.

Of course the implication of that is that China and its enablers are not done destroying American industry...yet.

[quant5]

No, I and others in the investment community know what is going on and we will not all just lay down and take it. The rich indeed get richer and they are doing it on the back of the little guy.

However, the little guy or how they view it also contains the 5% of the richest in the country. The ones selling out America to our country speedy downfall seem around 1/5%.

If We the People don’t change this behavior for them now, our enemies shortly will. As much as I hate to say this the next terrorist spectacular may actually spare the entire nation from downfall and I am sickened to even feel this way!!! Therefore, We the People are in a race against time to fix this and protect our nation from a NYC hiroshima. Why do our intelligence agencies tell us a nuclear terrorist attack is inevitable? That is the best they can tell us! Unacceptable.

[processing please hold]

"and I had the opportunity to ask her some questions about the NAFTA Superhighway. Of course, she answered, 'There's no NAFTA Superhighway.' But then Mary Peters proceeded to discuss the road system that would come up from Mexico and go through the United States up into Canada."

It doesn't exist but she explained where it was going to be.

Got it.......

[AuntB]

Lockheed Martin

That's quite a list, Liz. Do you know who the Administration connected lobbyist for Lockheed Martin is? He used to be head legal council for Homeland Security until recently. Philip Perry, son in law of the Vice President.