Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress debate begins on North America Union
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | September 25, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 09/25/2007 3:51:50 AM PDT by Man50D

A House resolution urging President Bush "not to go forward with the North American Union or the NAFTA Superhighway system" is – according to its sponsor Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., in an exclusive WND interview – "also a message to both the executive branch and the legislative branch."

As WND previously reported, on Jan. 22 Goode introduced H.C.R. 40, titled "Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada."

The bill has been referred to the House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

WND asked Goode if the president was risking electoral success for the Republican Party in 2008 with his insistence on pushing for North American integration via the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP.

"Yes," Goode answered. "You won't hear the leadership in the Republic Party admit it, but there are many in the House and Senate who know that illegal immigration has to be stopped and legal immigration has to be reduced. We are giving away the country so a few very rich people can get richer."

How did he react when President Bush referred to those who suggest the SPP could turn into the North American Union as "conspiracy theorists"?

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; cuereality; cuespookymusic; nau; northamericanunion; spp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
Wait a minute! How can Congress debate on something that doesn't exist? I thought the North American Union was just a figment of our imagination as some would lead us to believe?
1 posted on 09/25/2007 3:51:51 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

PINGO!


2 posted on 09/25/2007 3:54:45 AM PDT by Edgar3 (Steve Spurrier for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

It’s just as “imaginary” as the forty million Meehhickkkans that aren’t here either.


3 posted on 09/25/2007 3:55:15 AM PDT by Flintlock (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Be quiet about this fools.
The govt. will do as it wants and you have NO ability to do anything about it.
Reference the amnesty deal they tried to shove up your behind.
Govt.
Big business WILL prevail on the North American Union. You little people keep quiet.


4 posted on 09/25/2007 3:56:44 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The man behind the curtain poked his head out?


5 posted on 09/25/2007 3:57:04 AM PDT by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
This union is already a historical event.

It will be Mrs. Clinton's duty to let the citizens in on this dirty little secret...:(

6 posted on 09/25/2007 3:57:56 AM PDT by BlabItGrabIt (He Became Poor, So WE Might Be Rich :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; nicmarlo

ping!!!


7 posted on 09/25/2007 4:00:00 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

ping


8 posted on 09/25/2007 4:10:33 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (An American Patriot and an anti-Islam kind of fellow. (POI))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Wait a minute! How can Congress debate on something that doesn't exist? I thought the North American Union was just a figment of our imagination as some would lead us to believe?

Well as usual, after the debate, there will be those, including the President, who will simply deny that the debate happened.

9 posted on 09/25/2007 4:15:58 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
“WND asked Goode if the president was risking electoral success for the Republican Party in 2008 with his insistence on pushing for North American integration via the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP”

IMHO the prez doesn’t give a tinkers damn about the Republican party, conservatives or what we “little people” think.

I do believe that there is a cabal of so called elites who are doing whatever is in their power to make many of these things happen. I don’t think you’ll be seeing any serious investigations of them though.

What you will be seeing are tin-foil-hat investigation of anyone who publicly either announces opposition to their plans or, more importantly, anyone who attempts to alert the public of the existence of those plans.

I’m just sayin...

10 posted on 09/25/2007 4:16:17 AM PDT by Carbonado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock
It’s just as “imaginary” as the forty million Meehhickkkans that aren’t here either.

All we have heard for the last 48 hours or so is about Iamanutjob. Although I have to admit, he is a tyranical little fruitcake dictator(I read on some FR thread, The Persian Pipsqueak); however,it appears, The Persian Pipsqueak does a better job protecting Iran's borders, than our president does protecting ours.

11 posted on 09/25/2007 4:19:31 AM PDT by OBXWanderer (dontvoteincumbent.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carbonado
This is Virgil Goode ~ he just doesn't want any Interstate highway funds to go to new roads in Texas, Arkansas, Kentucky and Indiana (For I-69).

The whole NAFTA HIGHWAY hallucination is the most bizarre part of the story ~ I counted 35 different major multi-lane roads connecting Texas to Mexico just a few weeks ago.

Unless Texas is getting ready to rip up the roads and tear down the bridges I fail to see why anyone else should be concerned with another road down there.

In fact, I don't think Texas connects with the rest of the United States with as many roads as it has running to Mexico.

Their loyalty is suspect if all we do is check pavement.

12 posted on 09/25/2007 4:25:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Rep Virgil Goode:
"President Bush's position is that we need to carry out NAFTA and we need to have this free flow of goods with Mexico and Canada," Goode explained. "Well, Bush's approach involves a derogation of our sovereignty and it also undermines the security and the safety of the country.

"It will be much easier for a truck to get a container on the west coast of Mexico and haul in a biological or radiological or nuclear weapon than it would be if you are going to have to unload the trucks on the Texas-Mexico border and put the goods and material in a U.S. truck," he continued.

"The problem is that the NAU, NAFTA Superhighways and SPP all go back to money," Goode stressed. "The multinational companies want their goods from Mexico and China because they want the cheap labor."

Thank the Lord for people like Goode who are not afraid to call a spade a spade.

IMHO, those are the money (literally :) quotes from the article.

Oh, and just to make this thread official, I added the requisite "cuespookymusic" keyword above :-)

13 posted on 09/25/2007 4:27:02 AM PDT by upchuck (Psychiatrists have labeled George Bush's South-of-the-Border obsession as mexicosis. ~ firehat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"Yes," Goode answered, "but the best way to end SPP would be to have a chief executive that wouldn't do anything with it."

Good article, thanks.

14 posted on 09/25/2007 4:36:59 AM PDT by ScreamingFist (Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I guess you haven’t heard/seen the mega-highway’s being started - far larger than current interstate highways.


15 posted on 09/25/2007 4:45:05 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“...I fail to see why anyone else should be concerned with another road down there”

I would agree if that road is just another road.

What I do find alarming is the notion of putting inland “ports” (with questionable sovereignty) along that new “just another road”.


16 posted on 09/25/2007 4:55:26 AM PDT by Carbonado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

We’ll have to retire our tinfoil hats until the next big conspiracy comes along. But, what the hey, there’s always “Who shot JFK?”


17 posted on 09/25/2007 4:59:03 AM PDT by Sarajevo (Out of my mind. Back in five minutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I expect the usual troll swarm to start pretty quick, but that will just show you hit a raw nerve. Again.


18 posted on 09/25/2007 5:01:43 AM PDT by Sal (My "good" Senator Kyl exposed himself as a Grand Betrayer, corrupt to the core!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Did the President recently lie about the existence of plans for a North American Union?


19 posted on 09/25/2007 5:03:18 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (Reunite Gondwanaland!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sal
I expect the usual troll swarm to start pretty quick, but that will just show you hit a raw nerve. Again.

Hopefully President Bush's remarks aren't too rude. ;O)
20 posted on 09/25/2007 5:05:44 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson