Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doc1019
Same question about and after shock … how do we know that something called and “after shock” is not another earthquake?

Basically, they do an after-the-fact analysis of the situation. Start with the original earthquake. If afterwards, you have a succession of smaller earthquakes, those are aftershocks. However, if you have a larger earthquake after your original quake, then the first quake is then referred to as a 'foreshock.'

I know that this doesn't sound very scientific, but we have a lot to learn about earthquakes. To have a better determination of aftershock/foreshock, you'd have to understand the causes well enough to predict them, and we're far from that.

(I've felt three quakes in the last month that were approximately 4s--mild, but it raises my adrenaline level.)
16 posted on 09/25/2007 7:52:50 PM PDT by Mariebl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Mariebl

Thanks, any information is information that improves my knowledge library.


18 posted on 09/25/2007 7:56:20 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson